MRI-CEUS Fusion-Guided Lymphatic Mapping as a Preoperative Strategy for Lymphedema Patients Undergoing Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis Surgery

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 May 15:101907. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101907. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Objectives: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is useful in mapping lymphatic vessels in upper limb lymphedema, this study was aimed to evaluate its efficiency in lower limb lymphedema and investigate whether magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) enhance the efficiency of CEUS.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 48 patients with lymphedema undergoing lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery who received MRL and/or CEUS in addition to conventional indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography. The number of anastomotic sites and the duration per site (DPS) for LVA surgery were described and compared.

Results: Among the 48 patients subjected to analysis, it was observed that 12 (25%), 20 (41.67%), and 16 (33.33%) of them received ICG, ICG+CEUS, and ICG+CEUS+MRL, respectively. The ICG+CEUS group demonstrated a significant increase in the number of LVAs (median, 5 [range, 4 - 7]), compared to the ICG group (median, 2 [range, 1 - 4]) (p < .001). Moreover, the ICG+CEUS+MRL group exhibited a higher number of LVAs (median, 8 [range, 7 - 8.25]) compared to both the ICG+CEUS and ICG groups (p < .001). For lower limb lymphedema, the ICG+CEUS+MRL group displayed an elevated number of LVAs (median, 8 [interquartile range, 7 - 9]) (p = .003), in contrast to the ICG group (median, 3 [interquartile range, 1.75 - 4.25]). Furthermore, the DPS in the ICG+CEUS+MRL group (median, 50.56 [interquartile range, 48.13 - 59.29]) (p = .005) exhibited a remarkable decrease when compared to the ICG group (median, 131.25 [interquartile range, 86.75 - 198.13]).

Conclusion: MRL-CEUS fusion demonstrates superior performance in the identification of lymphatic vessel for lymphedema.

Keywords: MRI; lymphedema; lymphography; surgery; ultrasound.