Objective: Despite the pervasiveness and adverse impacts of financial toxicity (FT) in cancer care, there are no definitive measures for FT screening that have been widely integrated into clinical practice. The aim of this review is to evaluate current methods of assessing FT among patients with cancer and confirm factors associated with higher risk of FT.
Methods: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. We included peer-reviewed studies that cross-sectionally, longitudinally, or prospectively measured the self-reported financial impact of patients undergoing cancer care in the United States.
Results: Out of 1085 identified studies, 51 met final inclusion criteria. Outcomes evaluated included FT measures/tools, time and setting of screening, FT prevalence, and sociodemographic or clinical patient-level associated factors. Our findings demonstrate that there is wide variability in FT screening practices including in the timing (diagnosis vs treatment vs survivorship), setting (clinic-based, online, telephone/mail), utilized tools (21 unique tools, 7 previously validated), and interpretations of screening results (varying FT score cutoffs defining high vs. low FT). Younger age, lower income, lower education, non-white race, employment status change, advanced cancer stage, and systemic/radiation therapy, were among factors associated with worse FT across the studies.
Discussion: FT screening remains heterogenous within the United States. With the ever-escalating cost of cancer care, and the strong association between FT and poor patient outcomes, universal and routine FT screening is imperative in cancer care. Further research and multifaceted interventions identifying best practices for FT screening are needed.
Keywords: cancer; financial toxicity; health disparities; screening.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.