Comparison of Task-Layered Clinical Orientation to Traditional Orientation in a RN Residency Program

J Nurs Adm. 2024 Jun 1;54(6):341-346. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001436.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of using a task-layered clinical orientation when compared with the original patient-layering approach.

Background: Use of task-layering to orient new graduate nurses to the clinical world of nursing has been theorized to provide a decrease in cognitive load and allow for more streamlined clinical orientation.

Methods: The method of this study was a nonrandomized, comparative design to measure the outcomes of length of orientation, new graduate perceptions about level of confidence/comfort with professional nurse responsibilities/skills, stress, satisfaction, and perceptions about orientation.

Results: Analysis revealed no statistical significance between the 2 groups. However, the task-layered clinical orientation group completed orientation earlier than the traditional patient-layered group.

Conclusions: The task-layered approach to clinical orientation provided as good of outcomes as traditional orientation strategy and may result in cost savings due to decrease in total clinical orientation days.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Clinical Competence
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Inservice Training*
  • Male
  • Nursing Staff, Hospital / education
  • Nursing Staff, Hospital / psychology