Background: Malaria elimination mandates early and accurate diagnosis of infection. Although malaria diagnosis is programmatically dependent on microscopy/RDTs, molecular diagnosis has much better diagnostic accuracy. Higher cost of molecular diagnoses is a recognized challenge for use at the point of care. Because funding is always a recognized constraint, we performed financial cost-analyses of available molecular platforms for better utilization of available budget.
Methods: Two strategies were applied to deduce the cost per sample. Strategy 1 included recurring components (RC) in minimum pack size, and biologist's time whereas strategy 2 included only RC and non-recurring components and costs are calculated for sample sizes (1-1,000,000) to infer the sample size effect.
Results: Spin column-based manual DNA extraction (US$ 3.93 per sample) is the lowest-cost method, followed by magnetic bead-based automated, semi-automated, and PCI-based manual method. Further, DNA extraction cost per sample via spin column-based manual method and semi-automated method decreases with an increase in sample size up to 10,000. Real-time PCRs are ~ 2-fold more economical than conventional PCR, regardless of sample size.
Conclusions: This study is the first for malaria to estimate systematic molecular diagnosis financial costs. Kit-based and automated methods may replace conventional DNA extraction and amplification methods for a frugal high-throughput diagnosis.
Keywords: Automation; India; cost analysis; malaria; molecular diagnosis; non-recurring cost; recurring cost.