Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Humeral Shaft Fractures by Treatment Type

Chrystina L James; Jager Haan; Susan G Wager; Yash Hegde; Trevor D Wolterink; Stephanie Muh

doi:10.7759/cureus.58658

Comparing the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Humeral Shaft Fractures by Treatment Type

Cureus. 2024 Apr 20;16(4):e58658. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58658. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Authors

Chrystina L James¹, Jager Haan², Susan G Wager³, Yash Hegde², Trevor D Wolterink³, Stephanie Muh¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, USA.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, USA.
³ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, USA.

Abstract

Purpose: Humeral shaft fractures are common orthopedic injuries, representing 1-5% of all fractures. There is conflicting literature regarding the superiority of operative versus nonoperative treatment of these fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine functional outcomes and time to radiographic union in humeral shaft fractures with the hypothesis that both would be improved in patients treated operatively relative to those treated nonoperatively.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patients with humeral shaft fractures treated at a single large healthcare system between 2010 and 2020. A chart and radiograph review were performed to collect information on demographics, fracture, treatment, and outcome information. These measures were compared between patients treated operatively and nonoperatively.

Results: Five hundred seventeen adult patients meeting inclusion criteria were identified; 233 were treated nonoperatively, and 284 were treated operatively. The mean patient age was 50.2 years in those who underwent surgery relative to 59.9 years in those treated without surgery (P<0.001). Operatively-treated patients had significantly faster time to radiographic union at a median of 113 days compared to a median of 161 days in nonoperatively-treated patients (P=0.001). The operative group was made weight-bearing as tolerated significantly faster than the nonoperative group (84 days versus 98 days, respectively, P=0.002). No statistically significant difference was seen between the two treatment groups in rates of complications or range of motion at the time of radiographic union. However, patients who underwent surgery were found to be up to two times more likely to achieve full shoulder forward elevation by the time of their final follow-up than those treated without surgery (P=0.011).

Conclusion: Patients with humeral shaft fractures treated operatively have faster time to union, earlier weight bearing, and no change in the rate of complications compared to patients treated nonoperatively.

Keywords: fracture; humeral shaft; humerus; nonoperative; operative.