Diagnostic ability of macular nerve fiber layer thickness measured by swept-source OCT in preperimetric glaucoma

Shih-Jung Yeh; Yi-Wen Su; Mei-Ju Chen

doi:10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001112

Diagnostic ability of macular nerve fiber layer thickness measured by swept-source OCT in preperimetric glaucoma

J Chin Med Assoc. 2024 May 21. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001112. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Shih-Jung Yeh¹, Yi-Wen Su², Mei-Ju Chen^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei City Hospital, ZhongXing Branch, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
² Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
³ School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

PMID: 38771073
DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001112

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the diagnostic ability of macula retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL) thickness in preperimetric glaucoma (PPG) patients.

Methods: This prospective study included 83 patients with PPG and 83 age- and refractive error-matched normal control subjects. PPG was defined as a localized RNFL defect corresponding to glaucomatous optic disc changes with a normal visual field test. We used spectral-domain (SD) OCT to measure the circumpapillary RNFL (cpRNFL) thickness and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness. Swept-source (SS) OCT was used to measure cpRNFL thickness, macular ganglion cell layer + inner plexiform layer (IPL) thickness (GCL+), and macular ganglion cell layer + IPL+ mRNFL thickness (GCL++). The mRNFL thickness was defined as GCL++ minus GCL+. To evaluate the diagnostic power of each parameter, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was analyzed to differentiate PPG from the normal groups.

Results: Using SD-OCT, all GCIPL parameters and most cpRNFL parameters, except at the nasal and temporal quadrant, were significantly lower in PPG versus normal controls. PPG eyes had significantly smaller values than normal controls for all cpRNFL and GCL parameters measured by SS-OCT, except mRNFL at the superonasal area. The inferotemporal GCL++ had the largest AUROC value (0.904), followed by inferotemporal GCL+ (0.882), inferotemporal GCIPL thickness (0.871), inferior GCL++ (0.866), inferior cpRNFL thickness by SS-OCT (0.846), inferior cpRNFL thickness by SD-OCT (0.841), and inferotemporal mRNFL thickness (0.840). The diagnostic performance was comparable between inferotemporal mRNFL thickness and the best measures of GCL (inferotemporal GCL++, p = 0.098) and cpRNFL (inferior cpRNFL thickness by SS-OCT, p = 0.546).

Conclusion: The diagnostic ability of mRNFL thickness was comparable to that of the best measures of cpRNFL and GCL analysis for eyes with PPG. Therefore, mRNFL thickness could be a new parameter to detect early structural changes in PPG.