Post-trial monitoring of a randomised controlled trial of intensive glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes extended from 10 years to 24 years (UKPDS 91)
- PMID: 38772405
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00537-3
Post-trial monitoring of a randomised controlled trial of intensive glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes extended from 10 years to 24 years (UKPDS 91)
Abstract
Background: The 20-year UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed major clinical benefits for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes randomly allocated to intensive glycaemic control with sulfonylurea or insulin therapy or metformin therapy, compared with conventional glycaemic control. 10-year post-trial follow-up identified enduring and emerging glycaemic and metformin legacy treatment effects. We aimed to determine whether these effects would wane by extending follow-up for another 14 years.
Methods: 5102 patients enrolled between 1977 and 1991, of whom 4209 (82·5%) participants were originally randomly allocated to receive either intensive glycaemic control (sulfonylurea or insulin, or if overweight, metformin) or conventional glycaemic control (primarily diet). At the end of the 20-year interventional trial, 3277 surviving participants entered a 10-year post-trial monitoring period, which ran until Sept 30, 2007. Eligible participants for this study were all surviving participants at the end of the 10-year post-trial monitoring period. An extended follow-up of these participants was done by linking them to their routinely collected National Health Service (NHS) data for another 14 years. Clinical outcomes were derived from records of deaths, hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and accident and emergency unit attendances. We examined seven prespecified aggregate clinical outcomes (ie, any diabetes-related endpoint, diabetes-related death, death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and microvascular disease) by the randomised glycaemic control strategy on an intention-to-treat basis using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event and log-rank analyses. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN75451837.
Findings: Between Oct 1, 2007, and Sept 30, 2021, 1489 (97·6%) of 1525 participants could be linked to routinely collected NHS administrative data. Their mean age at baseline was 50·2 years (SD 8·0), and 41·3% were female. The mean age of those still alive as of Sept 30, 2021, was 79·9 years (SD 8·0). Individual follow-up from baseline ranged from 0 to 42 years, median 17·5 years (IQR 12·3-26·8). Overall follow-up increased by 21%, from 66 972 to 80 724 person-years. For up to 24 years after trial end, the glycaemic and metformin legacy effects showed no sign of waning. Early intensive glycaemic control with sulfonylurea or insulin therapy, compared with conventional glycaemic control, showed overall relative risk reductions of 10% (95% CI 2-17; p=0·015) for death from any cause, 17% (6-26; p=0·002) for myocardial infarction, and 26% (14-36; p<0·0001) for microvascular disease. Corresponding absolute risk reductions were 2·7%, 3·3%, and 3·5%, respectively. Early intensive glycaemic control with metformin therapy, compared with conventional glycaemic control, showed overall relative risk reductions of 20% (95% CI 5-32; p=0·010) for death from any cause and 31% (12-46; p=0·003) for myocardial infarction. Corresponding absolute risk reductions were 4·9% and 6·2%, respectively. No significant risk reductions during or after the trial for stroke or peripheral vascular disease were observed for both intensive glycaemic control groups, and no significant risk reduction for microvascular disease was observed for metformin therapy.
Interpretation: Early intensive glycaemic control with sulfonylurea or insulin, or with metformin, compared with conventional glycaemic control, appears to confer a near-lifelong reduced risk of death and myocardial infarction. Achieving near normoglycaemia immediately following diagnosis might be essential to minimise the lifetime risk of diabetes-related complications to the greatest extent possible.
Funding: University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Population Health Pump Priming.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC-BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests AIA, RLC, PC, and JL were supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. WNW was supported by a Chief Scientist's Office, Scotland, Senior Clinical Fellowship (SCAF_17_01). RRH reports personal fees from Anji Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, and Novartis; and is an Emeritus NIHR Senior Investigator.
Similar articles
-
10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470. Epub 2008 Sep 10. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18784090 Clinical Trial.
-
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9742976 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):854-65. Lancet. 1998. PMID: 9742977 Clinical Trial.
-
Oral antidiabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Drugs. 2005;65(3):385-411. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565030-00005. Drugs. 2005. PMID: 15669880 Review.
-
Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 11;(11):CD008143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008143.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29;(7):CD008143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008143.pub4. PMID: 24214280 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Intense simplified strategy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in patients with severe hyperglycaemia: multicentre, open label, randomised trial.BMJ. 2024 Oct 15;387:e080122. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080122. BMJ. 2024. PMID: 39406449 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Is glycaemic control still central in the hierarchy of priorities in type 2 diabetes management? The way forward is to combine glucose control and the prevention of cardiorenal complications.Diabetologia. 2024 Oct 4. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06284-4. Online ahead of print. Diabetologia. 2024. PMID: 39362980 No abstract available.
-
Glycaemic control is still central in the hierarchy of priorities in type 2 diabetes management.Diabetologia. 2024 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06254-w. Online ahead of print. Diabetologia. 2024. PMID: 39155282
-
Knowledge and Practice of Foot Care among Patients with Diabetes Attending Diabetes Center, Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 22;12(13):1244. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131244. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38998779 Free PMC article.
-
What will we see in diabetes in the next 10 years?J Diabetes. 2024 Jun;16(6):e13594. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13594. J Diabetes. 2024. PMID: 38890754 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
