Bacterial sealing ability of calcium silicate-based sealer for endodontic surgery: an in-vitro study

BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 21;24(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04309-3.

Abstract

Background: Apical surgery with standard retrograde maneuvers may be challenging in certain cases. Simplifying apical surgery to reduce operating time and streamline retrograde manipulation is an emerging need in clinical endodontics.

Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to compare the bacterial sealing ability of a calcium silicate-based sealer with the single cone technique combined with root end resection only, and calcium silicate-based sealer as a retrograde filling versus MTA retrofilling, and to analyze bacterial viability using confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM).

Materials and methods: In this in vitro experimental study, 50 extracted human maxillary incisor teeth were instrumented and randomly divided into five groups: three experimental groups, a positive control group, and a negative control group (n = 10/group). In the experimental groups, the roots were obturated using the single cone technique (SCT) and a calcium silicate-based sealer. In group 1, the roots were resected 3 mm from the apex with no further retrograde preparation or filling. In groups 2 and 3, the roots were resected, retroprepared, and retrofilled with either a calcium silicate-based sealer or MTA, respectively. Group 4 (positive control) was filled with a single gutta-percha cone without any sealer. In group 5 (negative control), the canals were left empty, and the roots were sealed with wax and nail varnish. A bacterial leakage model using Enterococcus faecalis was employed to assess the sealing ability over a 30-day period, checking for turbidity and analyzing colony forming units (CFUs) per milliliter. Five specimens from each group were examined using CLSM for bacterial viability. Data for the bacterial sealing ability were statistically analyzed using chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: The three experimental groups did not show significant differences in terms of bacterial leakage, or bacterial counts (CFUs) (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed when comparing the experimental groups to the positive control group. Notably, the calcium silicate-based sealer, when used as a retrofilling, yielded the best sealing ability. CLSM imaging revealed viable bacterial penetration in all the positive control group specimens while for the experimental groups, dead bacteria was the prominent feature seen.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that the bacterial sealing ability of calcium silicate-based sealer with the single cone technique combined with root end resection only and calcium silicate-based sealer as a retrograde filling were comparable with MTA retrofilling during endodontic surgical procedures.

Keywords: Apical resection; Bacterial leakage; Calcium silicate sealer; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Endodontic surgery; MTA; Retrograde filling; Single cone technique.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Compounds / therapeutic use
  • Apicoectomy / methods
  • Calcium Compounds* / therapeutic use
  • Dental Leakage / microbiology
  • Drug Combinations
  • Enterococcus faecalis / drug effects
  • Humans
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Incisor
  • Microbial Viability
  • Microscopy, Confocal
  • Oxides / pharmacology
  • Oxides / therapeutic use
  • Retrograde Obturation / methods
  • Root Canal Filling Materials* / pharmacology
  • Root Canal Filling Materials* / therapeutic use
  • Silicates* / therapeutic use

Substances

  • calcium silicate
  • mineral trioxide aggregate