Background: Quality healthcare is a global priority, reliant on robust health systems for evidence-based medicine. Clinical laboratories are the backbone of quality healthcare facilitating diagnostics, treatment, patient monitoring, and disease surveillance. Their effectiveness depends on sustainable delivery of accurate test results. Although the Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation (SLMTA) programme has enhanced laboratory quality in low-income countries, the long-term sustainability of this improvement remains uncertain.
Objective: To explore the sustainability of quality performance in clinical laboratories in Rwanda following the conclusion of SLMTA.
Methods: A quasi-experimental design was adopted, involving 47 laboratories divided into three groups with distinct interventions. While one group received continuous mentorship and annual assessments (group two), interventions for the other groups (groups one and three) ceased following the conclusion of SLMTA. SLMTA experts collected data for 10 years through assessments using WHO's StepwiseLaboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist. Descriptive and t-test analyses were conducted for statistical evaluation.
Results: Improvements in quality were noted between baseline and exit assessments across all laboratory groups (mean baseline: 35.3%, exit: 65.8%, p < 0.001). However, groups one and three experienced performance declines following SLMTA phase-out (mean group one: 64.6% in reference to 85.8%, p = 0.01; mean group three: 57.3% in reference to 64.7%, p < 0.001). In contrast, group two continued to enhance performance even years later (mean: 86.6%compared to 70.6%, p = 0.03).
Conclusion: A coordinated implementation of quality improvement plan that enables regular laboratory assessments to pinpoint and address the quality gaps is essential for sustaining quality services in clinical laboratories.
Keywords: Quality improvement; SLMTA; health system; intervention; laboratory assessment.
Main findings: We found that continuous laboratory quality improvement was achieved by laboratories that kept up with regular follow-ups, as opposed to those which phased out these followups prematurely.Added knowledge: This study has affirmed the necessity of maintaining mentorship and conducting regular quality assessments until requisite quality routines are established to sustain laboratory quality services.Global health impact for policy and action: These findings emphasise the significance of instituting a laboratory quality plan, with regular assessments, as policy directives to uphold and enhance quality standards, which benefits both local and global communities, given the pivotal role of laboratories in patient treatment, disease prevention, and surveillance.