Artificial Intelligence in the Provision of Health Care: An American College of Physicians Policy Position Paper
- PMID: 38830215
- DOI: 10.7326/M24-0146
Artificial Intelligence in the Provision of Health Care: An American College of Physicians Policy Position Paper
Abstract
Internal medicine physicians are increasingly interacting with systems that implement artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies. Some physicians and health care systems are even developing their own AI models, both within and outside of electronic health record (EHR) systems. These technologies have various applications throughout the provision of health care, such as clinical documentation, diagnostic image processing, and clinical decision support. With the growing availability of vast amounts of patient data and unprecedented levels of clinician burnout, the proliferation of these technologies is cautiously welcomed by some physicians. Others think it presents challenges to the patient-physician relationship and the professional integrity of physicians. These dispositions are understandable, given the "black box" nature of some AI models, for which specifications and development methods can be closely guarded or proprietary, along with the relative lagging or absence of appropriate regulatory scrutiny and validation. This American College of Physicians (ACP) position paper describes the College's foundational positions and recommendations regarding the use of AI- and ML-enabled tools and systems in the provision of health care. Many of the College's positions and recommendations, such as those related to patient-centeredness, privacy, and transparency, are founded on principles in the ACP Ethics Manual. They are also derived from considerations for the clinical safety and effectiveness of the tools as well as their potential consequences regarding health disparities. The College calls for more research on the clinical and ethical implications of these technologies and their effects on patient health and well-being.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Ethical Implications of the Electronic Health Record: In the Service of the Patient.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Aug;32(8):935-939. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4030-1. Epub 2017 Mar 20. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28321550 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What Complexity Science Predicts About the Potential of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning to Improve Primary Care.J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):332-345. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230219R1. J Am Board Fam Med. 2024. PMID: 38740483
-
Doctor Ex Machina: A Critical Assessment of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.J Med Philos. 2022 Feb 8;47(1):155-178. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhab036. J Med Philos. 2022. PMID: 35137175
-
From the History of the Croatian Dermatovenereological Society - The Croatian Medical Association and an Overview of Important Information Regarding the Journal Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica.Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Dec;26(4):344-348. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018. PMID: 30665489
-
[Artificial intelligence: An introduction for clinicians].Rev Mal Respir. 2023 Apr;40(4):308-313. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Rev Mal Respir. 2023. PMID: 36894376 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Primary Care Informatics: Vitalizing the Bedrock of Health Care.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 15;26:e60081. doi: 10.2196/60081. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39405512 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical