Applying ordered network analysis to video-recorded physician-nurse interactions to examine communication patterns associated with shared understanding in inpatient oncology care settings
- PMID: 38889940
- PMCID: PMC11191829
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084653
Applying ordered network analysis to video-recorded physician-nurse interactions to examine communication patterns associated with shared understanding in inpatient oncology care settings
Abstract
Objectives: The main aim of this study was to demonstrate how ordered network analysis of video-recorded interactions combined with verbal response mode (VRM) coding (eg, edification, disclosure, reflection and interpretation) can uncover specific communication patterns that contribute to the development of shared understanding between physicians and nurses. The major hypothesis was that dyads that reached shared understanding would exhibit different sequential relationships between VRM codes compared with dyads that did not reach shared understanding.
Design: Observational study design with the secondary analysis of video-recorded interactions.
Setting: The study was conducted on two oncology units at a large Midwestern academic health care system in the USA.
Participants: A total of 33 unique physician-nurse dyadic interactions were included in the analysis. Participants were the physicians and nurses involved in these interactions during patient care rounds.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the development of shared understanding between physicians and nurses, as determined by prior qualitative analysis. Secondary measures included the frequencies, orders and co-occurrences of VRM codes in the interactions.
Results: A Mann-Whitney U test showed that dyads that reached shared understanding (N=6) were statistically significantly different (U=148, p=0.00, r=0.93) from dyads that did not reach shared understanding (N=25) in terms of the sequential relationships between edification and disclosure, edification and advisement, as well as edification and questioning. Dyads that reached shared understanding engaged in more edification followed by disclosure, suggesting the importance of this communication pattern for reaching shared understanding.
Conclusions: This novel methodology demonstrates a robust approach to inform interventions that enhance physician-nurse communication. Further research could explore applying this approach in other healthcare settings and contexts.
Keywords: Cognition; Nurses; ONCOLOGY; Physicians; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Which Factors Promote Shared Understanding Between Physicians and Nurses in Inpatient Oncology Care Settings?: A Qualitative Exploration.Cancer Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr 01;45(2):E338-E344. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000959. Cancer Nurs. 2022. PMID: 34010215 Free PMC article.
-
Communication during ward rounds in internal medicine. An analysis of patient-nurse-physician interactions using RIAS.Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.011. Epub 2007 Jun 5. Patient Educ Couns. 2007. PMID: 17553652
-
Formative evaluation of the video reflexive ethnography method, as applied to the physician-nurse dyad.BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):160-166. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007728. Epub 2018 Jul 14. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019. PMID: 30007915 Free PMC article.
-
Nurses' and Physicians' Perceptions of Nurse-Physician Collaboration: A Systematic Review.J Nurs Adm. 2017 Mar;47(3):165-171. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000460. J Nurs Adm. 2017. PMID: 28157818 Review.
-
Collaboration between hospital physicians and nurses: an integrated literature review.Int Nurs Rev. 2013 Sep;60(3):291-302. doi: 10.1111/inr.12034. Epub 2013 May 27. Int Nurs Rev. 2013. PMID: 23961790 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources