Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jun 17;14(6):e084653.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084653.

Applying ordered network analysis to video-recorded physician-nurse interactions to examine communication patterns associated with shared understanding in inpatient oncology care settings

Affiliations
Observational Study

Applying ordered network analysis to video-recorded physician-nurse interactions to examine communication patterns associated with shared understanding in inpatient oncology care settings

Vitaliy Popov et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The main aim of this study was to demonstrate how ordered network analysis of video-recorded interactions combined with verbal response mode (VRM) coding (eg, edification, disclosure, reflection and interpretation) can uncover specific communication patterns that contribute to the development of shared understanding between physicians and nurses. The major hypothesis was that dyads that reached shared understanding would exhibit different sequential relationships between VRM codes compared with dyads that did not reach shared understanding.

Design: Observational study design with the secondary analysis of video-recorded interactions.

Setting: The study was conducted on two oncology units at a large Midwestern academic health care system in the USA.

Participants: A total of 33 unique physician-nurse dyadic interactions were included in the analysis. Participants were the physicians and nurses involved in these interactions during patient care rounds.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the development of shared understanding between physicians and nurses, as determined by prior qualitative analysis. Secondary measures included the frequencies, orders and co-occurrences of VRM codes in the interactions.

Results: A Mann-Whitney U test showed that dyads that reached shared understanding (N=6) were statistically significantly different (U=148, p=0.00, r=0.93) from dyads that did not reach shared understanding (N=25) in terms of the sequential relationships between edification and disclosure, edification and advisement, as well as edification and questioning. Dyads that reached shared understanding engaged in more edification followed by disclosure, suggesting the importance of this communication pattern for reaching shared understanding.

Conclusions: This novel methodology demonstrates a robust approach to inform interventions that enhance physician-nurse communication. Further research could explore applying this approach in other healthcare settings and contexts.

Keywords: Cognition; Nurses; ONCOLOGY; Physicians; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ONA mean network summarising all 33 physician–nurse interactions. Purple circles are plotted points for the physician-nurse models, and black nodes represent the codes, the coloured circle within a node represents self-connections. The larger the node size is the higher frequency and the code is being used as a response to other nodes. Directed connections are represented as triangles, with thicker and more saturated triangles represent stronger connections. The chevrons on the triangles indicate the direction of connections. ONA, ordered network analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean ordered networks for the physician–nurse dyads who reached a shared understanding (in blue; left) and those who did not (in red; right).

Similar articles

References

    1. Leape LL, Berwick DM. Five years after to err is human. JAMA 2005;293:2384. 10.1001/jama.293.19.2384 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sutcliffe KM, Lewton E, Rosenthal MM. Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med 2004;79:186–94. 10.1097/00001888-200402000-00019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tiwary A, Rimal A, Paudyal B, et al. . Poor communication by health care professionals may lead to life-threatening complications: examples from two case reports. Wellcome Open Res 2019;4:7. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15042.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruben BD. Communication theory and health communication practice: the more things change, the more they stay the same 1. Health Commun 2016;31:1–11. 10.1080/10410236.2014.923086 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:104–12. 10.1197/jamia.M1471 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources