Cribriform versus Intraductal: How to Determine the Difference

Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 24;16(11):2002. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112002.

Abstract

Over the years, our understanding of cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer (PCa) has evolved significantly, leading to substantial changes in their classification and clinical management. This review discusses the histopathological disparities between intraductal and cribriform PCa from a diagnostic perspective, aiming to aid pathologists in achieving accurate diagnoses. Furthermore, it discusses the ongoing debate surrounding the different recommendations between ISUP and GUPS, which pose challenges for practicing pathologists and complicates consensus among them. Recent studies have shown promising results in integrating these pathological features into clinical decision-making tools, improving predictions of PCa recurrence, cancer spread, and mortality. Future research efforts should focus on further unraveling the biological backgrounds of these entities and their implications for clinical management to ultimately improve PCa patient outcomes.

Keywords: cribriform; intraductal carcinoma; pathological risk factors; prostate cancer.

Publication types

  • Review

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.