Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;33(9):3381-3387.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08368-6. Epub 2024 Jun 23.

Associations between surgeons' preoperative expectations of lumbar surgery and patient-reported 2-year outcomes

Affiliations

Associations between surgeons' preoperative expectations of lumbar surgery and patient-reported 2-year outcomes

Carol A Mancuso et al. Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Surgeons' preoperative expectations of lumbar surgery may be associated with patient-reported postoperative outcomes.

Methods: Preoperatively spine surgeons completed a validated Expectations Survey for each patient estimating amount of improvement expected (range 0-100). Preoperative variables were clinical characteristics, spine-specific disability (ODI), and general health (RAND-12). Two years postoperatively patients again completed these measures and global assessments of satisfaction. Surgeons' expectations were compared to preoperative variables and to clinically important pre- to postoperative changes (MCID) in ODI, RAND-12, and pain and to satisfaction using hierarchical models.

Results: Mean expectations survey score for 402 patients was a 57 (IQR 44-68) reflecting moderate expectations. Lower scores were associated with preoperative older age, abnormal gait, sensation loss, vacuum phenomena, foraminal stenosis, prior surgery, and current surgery to more vertebrae (all p ≤ .05). Lower scores were associated postoperatively with not attaining MCID for the ODI (p = .02), RAND-12 (p = .01), and leg pain (p = .01). There were no associations between surgeons' scores and satisfaction (p = .06-.27). 55 patients (14%) reported unfavorable global outcomes and were more likely to have had fracture/infection/repeat surgery (OR 3.2, CI 1.6-6.7, p = .002).

Conclusion: Surgeons' preoperative expectations were associated with patient-reported postoperative improvement in symptoms and function, but not with satisfaction. These findings are consistent with clinical practice in that surgeons expect some but not complete improvement from surgery and do not anticipate that any particular patient will have markedly unfavorable satisfaction ratings. In addition to preoperative discussions about expectations, patients and surgeons should acknowledge different types of outcomes and address them jointly in postoperative discussions.

Keywords: Affective outcome; Delighted-terrible; Lumbar surgery; Satisfaction; Surgeons’ expectations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Zaina F, Mutter U, Donzelli S, Lusini M, Kleinstueck FS, Mannion AF (2024) How well can the clinician appraise the patients’ perception of the severity and impact of their back problem? Eur Spine J 33:39–46 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2952 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen ARM, Jenner JR (1989) A revised Oswestry disability questionnaire Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 187–204
    1. Kazis LE, Miller DR, Skinner KM, Lee A, Ren XS, Clark JA, Rogers WH, Spiro A III, Selim A, Linzer M, Payne SM, Mansell D, Fincke BG (2006) Applications of methodologies of the veterans health study in the VA health care system: conclusions and summary. J Ambul Care Manage 29:182–188 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry disability index, medical outcomes study questionnaire short form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:968–974 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources