Associations between surgeons' preoperative expectations of lumbar surgery and patient-reported 2-year outcomes
- PMID: 38910167
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08368-6
Associations between surgeons' preoperative expectations of lumbar surgery and patient-reported 2-year outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: Surgeons' preoperative expectations of lumbar surgery may be associated with patient-reported postoperative outcomes.
Methods: Preoperatively spine surgeons completed a validated Expectations Survey for each patient estimating amount of improvement expected (range 0-100). Preoperative variables were clinical characteristics, spine-specific disability (ODI), and general health (RAND-12). Two years postoperatively patients again completed these measures and global assessments of satisfaction. Surgeons' expectations were compared to preoperative variables and to clinically important pre- to postoperative changes (MCID) in ODI, RAND-12, and pain and to satisfaction using hierarchical models.
Results: Mean expectations survey score for 402 patients was a 57 (IQR 44-68) reflecting moderate expectations. Lower scores were associated with preoperative older age, abnormal gait, sensation loss, vacuum phenomena, foraminal stenosis, prior surgery, and current surgery to more vertebrae (all p ≤ .05). Lower scores were associated postoperatively with not attaining MCID for the ODI (p = .02), RAND-12 (p = .01), and leg pain (p = .01). There were no associations between surgeons' scores and satisfaction (p = .06-.27). 55 patients (14%) reported unfavorable global outcomes and were more likely to have had fracture/infection/repeat surgery (OR 3.2, CI 1.6-6.7, p = .002).
Conclusion: Surgeons' preoperative expectations were associated with patient-reported postoperative improvement in symptoms and function, but not with satisfaction. These findings are consistent with clinical practice in that surgeons expect some but not complete improvement from surgery and do not anticipate that any particular patient will have markedly unfavorable satisfaction ratings. In addition to preoperative discussions about expectations, patients and surgeons should acknowledge different types of outcomes and address them jointly in postoperative discussions.
Keywords: Affective outcome; Delighted-terrible; Lumbar surgery; Satisfaction; Surgeons’ expectations.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Concordance Between Patients' and Surgeons' Expectations of Lumbar Surgery.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Feb 15;46(4):249-258. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003775. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021. PMID: 33156286
-
Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:e328-e335. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 5. World Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 35259504
-
Do Surgeon Expectations Predict Clinically Important Improvements in WOMAC Scores After THA and TKA?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2150-2158. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5331-8. Epub 2017 Mar 28. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 28353050 Free PMC article.
-
Patient expectations impact patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after lumbar fusion.Spine J. 2024 Feb;24(2):273-277. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.023. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Spine J. 2024. PMID: 37797842
-
How Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Relate to Patient Expectations and Satisfaction in Spine Surgery: A Review.Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Oct 1;37(8):323-328. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001672. Epub 2024 Jul 29. Clin Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 39072525 Review.
References
-
- Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen ARM, Jenner JR (1989) A revised Oswestry disability questionnaire Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 187–204
-
- Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008) Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry disability index, medical outcomes study questionnaire short form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:968–974 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
