Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul-Aug;39(4):188-196.
doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common

Affiliations

Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common

Nabeel Qureshi et al. Am J Med Qual. 2024 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

The Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Innovations Exchange (IE) was developed to collect and report on innovative approaches to improving health care. The team reviewed 348 IE innovations including patient-reported satisfaction or experience measures. Innovations most often measured overall rating of care (61% of innovations), followed by access (52%) and provider-patient communication (12%). More than half used patient satisfaction surveys (n = 187) rather than patient experience surveys (n = 64). Innovations using patient experience surveys more often measured specific aspects of patient care, for example, access, versus a general overall rating of care. Most innovations using patient experience surveys administered nonvalidated, homegrown surveys, with few using the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality-endorsed, psychometrically-tested CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. The most common study design was postimplementation-only (65%), highlighting that methodological rigor used to assess patient-centeredness in the IE is low. Broad use of patient experience surveys and more rigorous evaluation study designs has increased some over time but is still lacking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Trend in use of Patient Experience over time

Similar articles

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. The values and value of patient-centered care. Annals of family medicine. Mar-Apr 2011;9(2):100–3. doi:10.1370/afm.1239 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Catalyst NEJM. What is patient-centered care? NEJM Catalyst. 2017;
    1. Davies E, Cleary PD. Hearing the patient's voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. Dec 2005;14(6):428–32. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.012955 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reeves R, Seccombe I. Do patient surveys work? The influence of a national survey programme on local quality-improvement initiatives. Qual Saf Health Care. Dec 2008;17(6):437–41. doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.022749 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources