Limitations in the clinical utility of vaccine challenge responses in the evaluation of primary antibody deficiency including Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders

Abstract

Vaccine challenge responses are an integral component in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with primary antibody deficiency, including Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders (CVID). There are no studies of vaccine challenge responses in primary hypogammaglobulinemia patients not accepted for subcutaneous/intravenous immunoglobulin (SCIG/IVIG) replacement compared to those accepted for such treatment. Vaccine challenge responses in patients enrolled in two long-term prospective cohorts, the New Zealand Hypogammaglobulinemia Study (NZHS) and the New Zealand CVID study (NZCS), were compared in this analysis. Almost all patients in the more severely affected SCIG/IVIG treatment group achieved protective antibody levels to tetanus toxoid and H. influenzae type B (HIB). Although there was a highly significant statistical difference in vaccine responses to HIB, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, there was substantial overlap in both groups. In contrast, there was no significant difference in Pneumococcal Polysaccharide antibody responses to Pneumovax® (PPV23). This analysis illustrates the limitations of evaluating vaccine challenge responses in patients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia to establish the diagnosis of CVID and in making decisions to treat with SCIG/IVIG. The conclusion from this study is that patients with symptoms attributable to primary hypogammaglobulinemia with reduced IgG should not be denied SCIG/IVIG if they have normal vaccine responses.

Keywords: CVID; Cohort studies; Hypogammaglobulinemia; SCIG/IVIG; Vaccine challenge responses.