Secondary databases in gynecologic cancer research

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Oct 7;34(10):1619-1629. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005677.

Abstract

Observational and cohort studies using large databases have made important contributions to gynecologic oncology. Knowledge of the advantages and potential limitations of commonly used databases benefits both readers and reviewers. In this review, researchers familiar with National Cancer Database (NCDB), Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), SEER-Medicare, MarketScan, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and Premier, describe each database, its included data, access, management, storage, highlights, and limitations. A better understanding of these commonly used datasets can help readers, reviewers, and researchers to more effectively interpret and apply study results, evaluate new research studies, and develop compelling and practice-changing research.

Keywords: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Costs and Cost Analysis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Retrospective Study.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomedical Research / standards
  • Databases, Factual*
  • Female
  • Genital Neoplasms, Female* / therapy
  • Humans
  • SEER Program
  • United States