How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39044849
- PMCID: PMC11262838
- DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Purpose: Patient experience is a key aspect of care quality. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS®) survey measures experiences with ambulatory care providers to inform public reporting, pay-for-performance initiatives, interventions, patient choice of physicians/practices, and quality improvement. Since the survey's 2007 release, no systematic review of its use in research has been published.
Methods: We reviewed English-language, peer-reviewed articles published since 2008 using CG-CAHPS survey data in the U.S. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and used the Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies.
Results: We examined 126 articles and included 52. Twenty-seven articles focused on general primary care, and the others focused on ambulatory specialty care. Of the 52 studies, 37 were cross-sectional, and the majority conducted patient-level regression analysis, controlling for patient characteristics. The most-used CAHPS measures were overall provider rating and the provider communication composite. CG-CAHPS data were primarily utilized to evaluate interventions (24 studies) and examine cross-sectional associations (21 studies) of site-level (eg, organizational climate), provider-level (physician empathy), and patient-level (medication adherence) factors with patient experience. Four studies reported disparities in patient experience.
Conclusions: The widespread use of CG-CAHPS data implies the survey's value in measuring and improving care quality. Unlike facility or plan surveys, the CG-CAHPS survey was designed to allow attribution to medical groups and clinicians, which, as evidence shows, is its main strength. Policymakers, researchers, clinicians, and health care leaders can leverage CG-CAHPS data in quality improvement efforts and interventions supporting patient-centered care.
Keywords: CAHPS Clinician and Group survey; ambulatory care; patient experience; quality of care.
© 2024 Advocate Aurora Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None.
Similar articles
-
Associations of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey Scores with Interventions and Site, Provider, and Patient Factors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.J Patient Exp. 2024 Oct 13;11:23743735241283204. doi: 10.1177/23743735241283204. eCollection 2024. J Patient Exp. 2024. PMID: 39403289 Free PMC article.
-
Some Aspects of Patient Experience Assessed by Practices Undergoing Patient-Centered Medical Home Transformation Are Measured by CAHPS, Others Are Not.Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Oct/Dec;29(4):179-187. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000263. Qual Manag Health Care. 2020. PMID: 32991534 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Comments on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey Reflect Improvements in Provider Behaviors From Coaching.J Healthc Manag. 2023 Jul-Aug 01;68(4):251-267. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00140. Epub 2023 Jun 19. J Healthc Manag. 2023. PMID: 37326612 Free PMC article.
-
Use of CAHPS® patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative.J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Jul 7;7:41-54. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S69963. eCollection 2015. J Healthc Leadersh. 2015. PMID: 29355183 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Associations of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey Scores with Interventions and Site, Provider, and Patient Factors: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.J Patient Exp. 2024 Oct 13;11:23743735241283204. doi: 10.1177/23743735241283204. eCollection 2024. J Patient Exp. 2024. PMID: 39403289 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common.Am J Med Qual. 2024 Jul-Aug 01;39(4):188-196. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197. Epub 2024 Jul 8. Am J Med Qual. 2024. PMID: 38976453 Free PMC article.
References
-
- de Silva A. A framework for measuring responsiveness. Vol. 32. World Health Organization; 2000.
-
- Solomon LS, Hays RD, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Psychometric properties of a group-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) instrument. Med Care. 2005;43:53–60. https://journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcare/fulltext/2005/01000/Evaluation_... . - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources