Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96.
doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer.

How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review

Denise D Quigley et al. J Patient Cent Res Rev. .

Abstract

Purpose: Patient experience is a key aspect of care quality. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS®) survey measures experiences with ambulatory care providers to inform public reporting, pay-for-performance initiatives, interventions, patient choice of physicians/practices, and quality improvement. Since the survey's 2007 release, no systematic review of its use in research has been published.

Methods: We reviewed English-language, peer-reviewed articles published since 2008 using CG-CAHPS survey data in the U.S. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and used the Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies.

Results: We examined 126 articles and included 52. Twenty-seven articles focused on general primary care, and the others focused on ambulatory specialty care. Of the 52 studies, 37 were cross-sectional, and the majority conducted patient-level regression analysis, controlling for patient characteristics. The most-used CAHPS measures were overall provider rating and the provider communication composite. CG-CAHPS data were primarily utilized to evaluate interventions (24 studies) and examine cross-sectional associations (21 studies) of site-level (eg, organizational climate), provider-level (physician empathy), and patient-level (medication adherence) factors with patient experience. Four studies reported disparities in patient experience.

Conclusions: The widespread use of CG-CAHPS data implies the survey's value in measuring and improving care quality. Unlike facility or plan surveys, the CG-CAHPS survey was designed to allow attribution to medical groups and clinicians, which, as evidence shows, is its main strength. Policymakers, researchers, clinicians, and health care leaders can leverage CG-CAHPS data in quality improvement efforts and interventions supporting patient-centered care.

Keywords: CAHPS Clinician and Group survey; ambulatory care; patient experience; quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Price RA, Elliott MN, Cleary PD, et al. Should health care providers be accountable for patients’ care experiences? J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:253–6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3111-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Silva A. A framework for measuring responsiveness. Vol. 32. World Health Organization; 2000.
    1. Dyer N, Sorra JS, Smith SA, et al. Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) clinician and group adult visit survey. Med Care. 2012;50:S28–34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solomon LS, Hays RD, Zaslavsky AM, et al. Psychometric properties of a group-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) instrument. Med Care. 2005;43:53–60. https://journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcare/fulltext/2005/01000/Evaluation_... . - PubMed
    1. Drake KM, Hargraves JL, Lloyd S, et al. The effect of response scale, administration mode, and format on responses to the CAHPS Clinician and Group survey. Health Serv Res. 2014;49:1387–99. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12160. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources