Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine/busulfan versus fludarabine/low-dose melphalan in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Abstract

Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens are commonly used in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, the optimal regimen remains unknown. In this study, the outcomes of adult patients with NHL who received fludarabine plus reduced-dose busulfan (6.4 mg/kg; Flu/Bu2) (n = 286) and fludarabine plus low-dose melphalan (80 or 100 mg/m²; Flu/Mel80-100) (n = 283) between January 2009 and December 2020 were compared using Japanese registry data. The primary end-point was the 5-year overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS was 53.8% (95% CI, 47.6-59.6) and 42.4% (95% CI, 35.6-49.0) in the Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Mel80-100 groups respectively (p = 0.030). After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the adjusted HR of Flu/Bu2 compared with Flu/Mel80-100 group for 5-year OS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60-0.99, p = 0.046), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.78-1.21, p = 0.798) for 5-year progression-free survival, 0.65 (95% CI, 0.45-0.94, p = 0.022) for 5-year cumulative risk of non-relapse mortality and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.95-1.64, p = 0.115) for 5-year cumulative risk of relapse. In this study, patients with NHL who received Flu/Bu2 were associated with better OS and lower non-relapse mortality than those who received Flu/Mel80-100.

Keywords: allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; fludarabine/busulfan; fludarabine/low‐dose melphalan; non‐Hodgkin lymphoma; reduced‐intensity conditioning.