Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425070.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25070.

Electronic Health Record-Based Screening for Intimate Partner Violence: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Electronic Health Record-Based Screening for Intimate Partner Violence: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

Leslie Lenert et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue, with a 25% lifetime prevalence. Screening for IPV in primary care is a recommended practice whose effectiveness is debated.

Objective: To assess the effect of an electronic health record (EHR)-based multifactorial intervention screening on the detection of IPV risk in primary care practice.

Design, setting, and participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial used a stepped-wedge design to assign 15 family medicine primary care clinics in the Medical University of South Carolina Health System in the Charleston region to 3 matched blocks from October 6, 2020, to March 31, 2023. All women aged 18 to 49 years who were seen in these clinics participated in this study.

Intervention: A noninterruptive EHR alert combined with confidential screening by computer questionnaire using the EHR platform followed by risk assessment and a decision support template.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were the rate at which patients were screened for IPV across the clinics and the rate at which patients at risk for IPV were detected by screening procedures.

Results: The study clinics cared for 8895 unique patients (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [8.7] years; 1270 [14.3%] with Medicaid or Medicare and 7625 [85.7%] with private, military, or other insurance) over the study period eligible for the screening intervention. The intervention had significant effects on the overall rate of screening for IPV, increasing the rate of screening from 45.2% (10 268 of 22 730 patient visits) to 65.3% (22 303 of 34 157 patient visits) when the noninterruptive alert was active (relative risk, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.44-1.49]; P < .001). The confidential screening process was more effective than baseline nurse-led oral screening at identifying patients reporting past-year IPV (130 of 8895 patients [1.5%] vs 9 of 17 433 patients [0.1%]).

Conclusions and relevance: The intervention was largely effective in increasing screening adherence and the positive detection rate of IPV in primary care. A highly private approach to screening for IPV in primary care may be necessary to achieve adequate detection rates while addressing potential safety issues of patients experiencing IPV.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06284148.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ennis reported receiving grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Randomized Stepped-Wedge Design With Clinics Identified
Green color indicates the active intervention phase.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hahn CK, Gilmore AK, Aguayo RO, Rheingold AA. Perinatal intimate partner violence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45(3):535-547. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2018.04.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Blazina I. Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(11):796-808, W-279, W-280, W-281, W-282. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-11-201206050-00447 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith SG, Zhang X, Basile KC, et al. . The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence survey: 2015 data brief—updated release. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. November 2018. Accessed June 21, 2024. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/60893
    1. Perone HR, Dietz NA, Belkowitz J, Bland S. Intimate partner violence: analysis of current screening practices in the primary care setting. Fam Pract. 2022;39(1):6-11. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmab069 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heron RL, Eisma MC. Barriers and facilitators of disclosing domestic violence to the healthcare service: a systematic review of qualitative research. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;29(3):612-630. doi:10.1111/hsc.13282 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data