Comparing clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after ischaemic stroke: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors users versus non-users. A propensity score matching National Cohort Study
- PMID: 39134462
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.15804
Comparing clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after ischaemic stroke: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors users versus non-users. A propensity score matching National Cohort Study
Abstract
Aim: This nationwide cohort study evaluated the impact of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after ischaemic stroke (IS), aiming to compare clinical outcomes between SGLT2i-treated patients and those not receiving SGLT2i.
Materials and methods: Utilizing Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 707 patients with T2DM treated with SGLT2i and 27 514 patients not treated with SGLT2i after an IS, respectively, from 1 May 2016 to 31 December 2019. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics. The follow-up period extended from the index date (3 months after the index acute IS) until the independent occurrence of the study outcomes, 6 months after discontinuation of the index drug, or the end of the study period (31 December 2020), whichever came first.
Results: After propensity score matching, compared with the non-SGLT2i group (n = 2813), the SGLT2i group (n = 707) exhibited significantly lower recurrent IS rates (3.605% per year vs. 5.897% per year; hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.88; p = 0.0131) and a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (5.396% per year vs. 7.489% per year; hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.85; p = 0.0058). No significant differences were observed in the rates of acute myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or lower limb amputation.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate significantly lower risks of recurrent IS and all-cause mortality among patients with T2DM receiving SGLT2i treatment. Further studies are required to validate these results and investigate the underlying mechanisms behind the observed effects.
Keywords: ischaemic stroke; sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; type 2 diabetes mellitus.
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors vs. Non-Users.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Aug;116(2):426-434. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3304. Epub 2024 May 13. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38738997
-
Major adverse cardiovascular and limb events in patients with diabetes and concomitant peripheral artery disease treated with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 30;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01118-0. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020. PMID: 32998736 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor on the Risks of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke and Mortality in Diabetic Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Study in Hong Kong.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Jun;37(3):561-569. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07319-x. Epub 2022 Feb 10. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023. PMID: 35142921 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiovascular Outcomes and Risks After Initiation of a Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor: Results From the EASEL Population-Based Cohort Study (Evidence for Cardiovascular Outcomes With Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in the Real World).Circulation. 2018 Apr 3;137(14):1450-1459. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031227. Epub 2017 Nov 13. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 29133607 Free PMC article.
-
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor versus metformin as first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multi-institution database study.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Nov 9;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01169-3. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020. PMID: 33167990 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global, regional and country‐level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119.
-
- Faselis C, Katsimardou A, Imprialos K, Deligkaris P, Kallistratos M, Dimitriadis K. Microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18(2):117‐124.
-
- Viigimaa M, Sachinidis A, Toumpourleka M, Koutsampasopoulos K, Alliksoo S, Titma T. Macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18(2):110‐116.
-
- O'Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case‐control study. Lancet. 2010;376(9735):112‐123.
-
- Khoury JC, Kleindorfer D, Alwell K, et al. Diabetes mellitus: a risk factor for ischemic stroke in a large biracial population. Stroke. 2013;44(6):1500‐1504.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
