Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 20;24(1):955.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11322-3.

Perceptions of hospital electronic health record (EHR) training, support, and patient safety by staff position and tenure

Affiliations

Perceptions of hospital electronic health record (EHR) training, support, and patient safety by staff position and tenure

Joanne Campione et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Hospitals rely on their electronic health record (EHR) systems to assist with the provision of safe, high quality, and efficient health care. However, EHR systems have been found to disrupt clinical workflows and may lead to unintended consequences associated with patient safety and health care professionals' perceptions of and burden with EHR usability and interoperability. This study sought to explore the differences in staff perceptions of the usability and safety of their hospital EHR system by staff position and tenure.

Methods: We used data from the AHRQ Surveys on Patient Safety Culture® (SOPS®) Hospital Survey Version 1.0 Database and the SOPS Health Information Technology Patient Safety Supplemental Items ("Health IT item set") collected from 44 hospitals and 8,880 staff in 2017. We used regression modeling to examine perceptions of EHR system training, EHR support & communication, EHR-related workflow, satisfaction with the EHR system, and the frequency of EHR-related patient safety and quality issues by staff position and tenure, while controlling for hospital ownership type and bed-size.

Results: In comparison to RNs, pharmacists had significantly lower (unfavorable) scores for EHR system training (regression coefficient = -0.07; p = 0.047), and physicians, hospital management, and the IT staff were significantly more likely to report high frequency of inaccurate EHR information (ORs = 2.03, 1.34, 1.72, respectively). Compared to staff with 11 or more years of hospital tenure, new staff (less than 1 year at the hospital) had significantly lower scores for EHR system training, but higher scores for EHR support & communication (p < 0.0001). Dissatisfaction of the EHR system was highest among physicians and among staff with 11 or more years tenure at the hospital.

Conclusions: There were significant differences in the Health IT item set's results across staff positions and hospital tenure. Hospitals can implement the SOPS Health IT Patient Safety Supplemental Items as a valuable tool for identifying incongruity in the perceptions of EHR usability and satisfaction across staff groups to inform targeted investment in EHR system training and support.

Keywords: Electronic health records (EHR); Health IT; Hospital EHR system; Patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors acknowledge no conflict of interest in the submission.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean Scores of the EHR System Training and Support by Hospital Tenure Note: Hospital tenure included 8548 staff. The Information Technology staff (n = 332) were excluded from tenure analysis

Similar articles

References

    1. Kruse CS, Beane A. Health Information Technology Continues to show positive effect on Medical outcomes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e41. 10.2196/jmir.8793. Published 2018 Feb 5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campanella P, Lovato E, Marone C, et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2016;26(1):60–4. 10.1093/eurpub/ckv122. 10.1093/eurpub/ckv122 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howe JL, Adams KT, Hettinger AZ, Ratwani RM. Electronic health record usability issues and potential contribution to patient harm. JAMA. 2018;319(12):1276–8. 10.1001/jama.2018.1171 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Melnick ER, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky CA et al. The association between perceived electronic health record usability and professional burnout among US physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(3):476–487. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.09.024. - PubMed
    1. Meeks DW, Smith MW, Taylor L, Sittig DF, Scott JM, Singh H. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2014;21(06):1053–9.10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002578 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources