Bringing Imaging Biomarkers Into Clinical Reality in Psychiatry

JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 1;81(11):1142-1147. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2553.

Abstract

Importance: Advancing precision psychiatry, where treatments are based on an individual's biology rather than solely their clinical presentation, requires attention to several key attributes for any candidate biomarker. These include test-retest reliability, sensitivity to relevant neurophysiology, cost-effectiveness, and scalability. Unfortunately, these issues have not been systematically addressed by biomarker development efforts that use common neuroimaging tools like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). Here, the critical barriers that neuroimaging methods will need to overcome to achieve clinical relevance in the near to intermediate term are examined.

Observations: Reliability is often overlooked, which together with sensitivity to key aspects of neurophysiology and replicated predictive utility, favors EEG-based methods. The principal barrier for EEG has been the lack of large-scale data collection among multisite psychiatric consortia. By contrast, despite its high reliability, structural MRI has not demonstrated clinical utility in psychiatry, which may be due to its limited sensitivity to psychiatry-relevant neurophysiology. Given the prevalence of structural MRIs, establishment of a compelling clinical use case remains its principal barrier. By contrast, low reliability and difficulty in standardizing collection are the principal barriers for functional MRI, along with the need for demonstration that its superior spatial resolution over EEG and ability to directly image subcortical regions in fact provide unique clinical value. Often missing, moreover, is consideration of how these various scientific issues can be balanced against practical economic realities of psychiatric health care delivery today, for which embedding economic modeling into biomarker development efforts may help direct research efforts.

Conclusions and relevance: EEG seems most ripe for near- to intermediate-term clinical impact, especially considering its scalability and cost-effectiveness. Recent efforts to broaden its collection, as well as development of low-cost turnkey systems, suggest a promising pathway by which neuroimaging can impact clinical care. Continued MRI research focused on its key barriers may hold promise for longer-horizon utility.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Brain / diagnostic imaging
  • Brain / physiopathology
  • Electroencephalography* / standards
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / standards
  • Mental Disorders* / diagnosis
  • Neuroimaging* / methods
  • Neuroimaging* / standards
  • Precision Medicine / methods
  • Psychiatry* / methods
  • Psychiatry* / standards
  • Reproducibility of Results