Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433962.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33962.

Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity Following a Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement

Affiliations

Outcomes by Race and Ethnicity Following a Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Joint Replacement

Narae Kim et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model, a traditional Medicare bundled payment program for lower-extremity joint replacement, is associated with care for patients outside traditional Medicare. Whether CJR model outcomes have differed by patient race or ethnicity outside of traditional Medicare is unclear.

Objective: To evaluate outcomes associated with the CJR model among Hispanic patients not enrolled in traditional Medicare.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used hospitalization data from California's Patient Discharge Dataset for all patients who underwent lower-extremity joint replacement in California between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. In California, 3 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were randomly selected to participate in CJR in April 2016. Hospitals not participating in other Medicare Alternative Payment Models were included in the treated group if they were in these 3 MSAs and in the control group if they were in the remaining 23 MSAs. The data analysis was performed between October 1 and December 31, 2023.

Exposure: Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement program implementation.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were hospital length of stay and home discharge rates by race and ethnicity. Home discharge status included self-care, the use of home health services, and hospice care at home. Event study, difference-in-differences, and triple differences models were used to estimate differential changes in health care service use by race and ethnicity for patients in the treated MSAs compared with the control MSAs before vs after CJR implementation.

Results: Of 309 834 hospitalizations (patient mean [SD] age, 68.3 [11.3] years; 60.6% women; 14.8% Hispanic; 72.4% non-Hispanic White), 48.0% were in treated MSAs and 52.0% in control MSAs. The CJR program was associated with an increase in home discharge rates for patients without traditional Medicare coverage; however, the increase differed by patient race and ethnicity. The increase was 0.05 (95% CI, 0.02-0.08) percentage points higher for Hispanic patients with Medicare Advantage and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04) percentage points higher for Hispanic patients without Medicare compared with their non-Hispanic White counterparts.

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study shows that CJR program outcomes differed by race and ethnicity for patients covered outside traditional Medicare, with home discharge rates increasing more for Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic White patients. These findings suggest the importance of considering differential outcomes of Medicare payment policies for racial and ethnic minority patient populations beyond the initially targeted groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Jacobson reported receiving grants from the American Heart Association; J-PAL North America, Health Care Delivery Initiative; J-PAL North America, State and Local Innovation Initiative; National Institute for Health Care Management Research; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Unadjusted Changes in Health Care Services Use Among Hispanic Patients and White Patients in Treated and Control Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in California, 2014-2017 (N = 171 113)
The red line indicates the time of the policy (Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement) implementation, which occurred in the second quarter of 2016. MA indicates Medicare Advantage; Q, quarter.

Similar articles

References

    1. Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS, et al. . Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(17):1386-1397. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.01141 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780-785. doi:10.2106/00004623-200704000-00012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finkelstein A, Ji Y, Mahoney N, Skinner J. Mandatory Medicare bundled payment program for lower extremity joint replacement and discharge to institutional postacute care: interim analysis of the first year of a 5-year randomized trial. JAMA. 2018;320(9):892-900. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12346 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ko H, Martin BI, Nelson RE, Pelt CE. Patient selection in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model. Health Serv Res. 2022;57(1):72-90. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13880 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilcock AD, Barnett ML, McWilliams JM, Grabowski DC, Mehrotra A. Hospital responses to incentives in episode-based payment for joint surgery: a controlled population-based study. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(7):932-940. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1897 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms