Implications of the initial Braidwood v. Becerra ruling for colorectal cancer outcomes: a modeling study

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Apr 1;117(4):790-794. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae244.

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) eliminated patient cost-sharing for United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) recommended services. However, if the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit fully upheld a US District Court ruling in Braidwood Management v. Becerra, 666 F. Supp. 3d 613 (N.D. Tex 2023), cost-sharing for USPSTF recommendations made after ACA passage would have been reinstated for more than 150 million people. The case would have reinstated cost-sharing for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for ages 45-49 years and for polyp removal during (diagnostic) colonoscopy across all ages. Using the MISCAN-Colon model, we simulated the potential impact on CRC outcomes, assuming early-onset CRC trends and lower screening participation. An 8-percentage-point decline in screening participation could increase CRC incidence by 5.1% and CRC mortality by 9.1%, with slightly lower costs due to increased cost-sharing. Larger decreases in screening participation can result in higher costs from increased incidence and delayed diagnoses.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Colonoscopy / economics
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / economics
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / epidemiology
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / mortality
  • Cost Sharing* / economics
  • Cost Sharing* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Early Detection of Cancer* / economics
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / economics
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act* / economics
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • United States / epidemiology