Arm Position and Blood Pressure Readings: The ARMS Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 39373998
- PMCID: PMC11459360
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5213
Arm Position and Blood Pressure Readings: The ARMS Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Guidelines for blood pressure (BP) measurement recommend arm support on a desk with the midcuff positioned at heart level. Still, nonstandard positions are used in clinical practice (eg, with arm resting on the lap or unsupported on the side).
Objective: To determine the effect of different arm positions on BP readings.
Design, setting, and participants: This crossover randomized clinical trial recruited adults between the ages of 18 and 80 years in Baltimore, Maryland, from August 9, 2022, to June 1, 2023.
Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to sets of triplicate BP measurements with the arm positioned in 3 ways: (1) supported on a desk (desk 1; reference), (2) hand supported on lap (lap), and (3) arm unsupported at the side (side). To account for intrinsic BP variability, all participants underwent a fourth set of BP measurements with the arm supported on a desk (desk 2).
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were the difference in differences in mean systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) between the reference BP (desk 1) and the 2 arm support positions (lap and side): (lap or side - desk 1) - (desk 2 - desk 1). Results were also stratified by hypertensive status, age, obesity status, and access to health care within the past year.
Results: The trial enrolled 133 participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [17] years; 70 [53%] female); 48 participants (36%) had SBP of 130 mm Hg or higher, and 55 participants (41%) had a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 30 or higher. Lap and side positions resulted in statistically significant higher BP readings than desk positions, with the difference in differences as follows: lap, SBP Δ 3.9 (95% CI, 2.5-5.2) mm Hg and DBP Δ 4.0 (95% CI, 3.1-5.0) mm Hg; and side, SBP Δ 6.5 (95% CI, 5.1-7.9) mm Hg and DBP Δ 4.4 (95% CI, 3.4-5.4) mm Hg. The patterns were generally consistent across subgroups.
Conclusion and relevance: This crossover randomized clinical trial showed that commonly used arm positions (lap or side) resulted in substantial overestimation of BP readings and may lead to misdiagnosis and overestimation of hypertension.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05372328.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Effects of Cuff Size on the Accuracy of Blood Pressure Readings: The Cuff(SZ) Randomized Crossover Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Oct 1;183(10):1061-1068. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3264. JAMA Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37548984 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of arm position and pulse pressure on the validation of a wrist-cuff blood pressure measurement device in a high risk population.Int J Gen Med. 2010 Apr 8;3:119-25. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s7526. Int J Gen Med. 2010. PMID: 20463830 Free PMC article.
-
Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement.J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Jul;17(7):459-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001573. J Hum Hypertens. 2003. PMID: 12821952
-
Comparing the Effectiveness of Home, Clinic, and Kiosk Blood Pressure Checks for Diagnosing High Blood Pressure – The BP-CHECK Study [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 Aug. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 Aug. PMID: 39078929 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of dual alpha and beta blockers for primary hypertension.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 26;2015(8):CD007449. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007449.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26306578 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hypertension. World Health Organization . March 16, 2023. Accessed November 13, 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension
-
- Familoni OB, Olunuga TO. Comparison of the effects of arm position and support on blood pressure in hypertensive and normotensive subjects. Cardiovasc J S Afr. 2005;16(2):85-88. - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
