Does Femoral Stem Design Influence Periprosthetic Fracture Incidence and Morphology in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

J Arthroplasty. 2025 Apr;40(4):1062-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.028. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

Abstract

Background: As the incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases, the number of periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs) will also rise. The surgical approach and stem design have been shown to influence the rate of PFF. This study evaluated PFF in cementless THA done through the posterior approach and described how stem design influences intraoperative and early postoperative fracture incidence and morphology.

Methods: A retrospective review of 3,183 primary THAs for osteoarthritis from 2013 to 2021 was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, femoral stem designs, intraoperative and early postoperative PFFs (< 90 days), and aseptic femoral revisions were recorded. Stems were classified as single-wedge taper (Type 1), double-wedge taper (Type 2), or ream and broach (Type 3). There were 1,192 Type 1, 240 Type 2, and 1,726 Type 3 femoral stems. The PFF and aseptic femoral revisions were compared with univariable and multivariable analyses. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated survival to femoral revision.

Results: In this population, 25 patients (0.8%) had an intraoperative or early postoperative PFF. Patients who had PFFs were older (68 versus 63; P = 0.03) and more likely to be women (76 versus 24%; P = 0.02). Type 2 stems had a significantly higher incidence of all-cause PFFs when compared to Type 1 (3.6 versus 0.7%; P < 0.01) and Type 3 (3.6 versus 0.4%; P < 0.01) stems. Type 2 stems also had a higher incidence of Vancouver B2 PFFs when compared to Type 3 stems (0.8 versus 0.05%; P = 0.04). Stem design was not associated with PFF or all-cause femoral revision. There were no differences in survival to femoral revision.

Conclusions: Double-wedge taper stems may be associated with increased intraoperative and early postoperative PFFs, including those requiring femoral stem revision. However, there was no statistically significant difference in late PFF, aseptic loosening, or femoral revision.

Keywords: complications; periprosthetic femur fracture; revision hip arthroplasty; stem design; total hip arthroplasty.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip* / adverse effects
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip* / instrumentation
  • Female
  • Femoral Fractures* / epidemiology
  • Femoral Fractures* / etiology
  • Femur / surgery
  • Hip Prosthesis* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis, Hip / surgery
  • Periprosthetic Fractures* / epidemiology
  • Periprosthetic Fractures* / etiology
  • Prosthesis Design* / adverse effects
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies