Comparative Effectiveness of Albumin vs No Albumin on Renal Replacement Therapy and Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock and Renal Impairment
- PMID: 39426720
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.10.012
Comparative Effectiveness of Albumin vs No Albumin on Renal Replacement Therapy and Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock and Renal Impairment
Abstract
Background: Albumin infusions may be renally protective or harmful in patients with septic shock who have kidney impairment. This can affect the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and in-hospital mortality.
Research question: Does the early use of albumin mitigate the need for RRT or in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock and kidney impairment on hospital admission?
Study design and methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, inverse probability-of-treatment weighted cohort study conducted in 220 geographically diverse community and teaching hospitals across the United States. Adult patients were included if they had septic shock and kidney impairment on hospital admission. Patients were categorized as those who received albumin (within 24 hours of admission) or no albumin during hospitalization. Proportion of patients with RRT or in-hospital mortality were compared between groups.
Results: Of the 9,988 patients included in the final cohort, 7,929 did not receive albumin and 2,059 received albumin. Patients had a mean ± SD age of 67.8 ± 14.8 years, 46.3% were female, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 32 ± 12 mL/min/1.73 m2 on the day of admission. In the weighted cohort, the composite outcome of RRT or in-hospital mortality occurred in 33.8% without albumin and 39.7% with albumin treatment (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14-1.47; P < .001). There was no significant difference with 5% albumin (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.84-1.37), but there was a significantly increased risk with 25% albumin (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.16-1.76).
Interpretation: In patients with septic shock and kidney impairment on hospital admission, early albumin use may be associated with an increased composite outcome of RRT or in-hospital mortality. This increased risk is most associated with hyperoncotic albumin rather than iso-oncotic albumin.
Keywords: acute kidney injury; albumins; mortality; sepsis; septic shock.
Copyright © 2024 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures None declared.
Similar articles
-
Coupled-plasma filtration and adsorption for severe burn patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy.Burns. 2020 Feb;46(1):190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 Nov 29. Burns. 2020. PMID: 31787473
-
Variation in the use of renal replacement therapy in patients with septic shock: a substudy of the prospective multicenter observational FINNAKI study.Crit Care. 2014 Feb 5;18(1):R26. doi: 10.1186/cc13716. Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 24499547 Free PMC article.
-
Timing of Renal Support and Outcome of Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Post Hoc Analysis of the AKIKI Randomized Clinical Trial.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul 1;198(1):58-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1255OC. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29351007 Clinical Trial.
-
Resuscitation Fluids in Septic Shock: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Shock. 2020 Jun;53(6):679-685. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001468. Shock. 2020. PMID: 31693630 Review.
-
Early versus Delayed Strategies for Renal Replacement Therapy Initiation in Adult Patients with Severe Acute Kidney Injury Complicating Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2022 May-Jun;33(3):449-486. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.385969. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2022. PMID: 37843147 Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
