Non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase versus alteplase for patients with massive pulmonary embolism: a randomized open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial, FORPE

J Thromb Haemost. 2025 Feb;23(2):657-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.09.035. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

Abstract

Background: Non-immunogenic staphylokinase is a modified recombinant staphylokinase with low immunogenicity, high thrombolytic activity, and fibrin selectivity.

Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of a single intravenous bolus of non-immunogenic staphylokinase compared with those of alteplase in patients with massive pulmonary embolism and hemodynamic instability.

Methods: A randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial, the FORPE (FORtelyzin Pulmionary Embolism), was conducted in Russia. A total of 310 patients aged 18 years and older with computed tomography pulmonary angiography confirmed diagnosis of massive pulmonary embolism and right ventricular dysfunction were included. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either non-immunogenic staphylokinase (15 mg) or alteplase (100 mg), both administered intravenously. The primary efficacy endpoint was death from all causes within 7 days of randomization.

Results: A total of 155 patients were randomly assigned to receive non-immunogenic staphylokinase, and 155 received alteplase. In the non-immunogenic staphylokinase group, the primary efficacy endpoint was 2% in the intention-to-treat population, while in the alteplase group, it was 3% (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.11-4.49; P = 1.00). The difference in the primary efficacy endpoint was 0.6% (95% CI, -2.8% to 4.0%). Thus, the lower limit of the 95% CI did not cross the margin of non-inferiority. No cases of major bleeding were recorded in the non-immunogenic staphylokinase group, whereas there were 5 cases of major bleeding (3%; P = .09) in the alteplase group.

Conclusion: Non-immunogenic staphylokinase was non-inferior to alteplase in patients with massive pulmonary embolism. Future observational studies are needed to assess its safety and efficacy.

Keywords: massive pulmonary embolism; non-immunogenic staphylokinase; randomized clinical trial; thrombolytic therapy.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Equivalence Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Computed Tomography Angiography
  • Female
  • Fibrinolytic Agents* / administration & dosage
  • Fibrinolytic Agents* / adverse effects
  • Fibrinolytic Agents* / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Metalloendopeptidases* / administration & dosage
  • Metalloendopeptidases* / adverse effects
  • Metalloendopeptidases* / immunology
  • Metalloendopeptidases* / therapeutic use
  • Middle Aged
  • Pulmonary Embolism* / diagnosis
  • Pulmonary Embolism* / diagnostic imaging
  • Pulmonary Embolism* / drug therapy
  • Pulmonary Embolism* / mortality
  • Pulmonary Embolism* / physiopathology
  • Recombinant Proteins / administration & dosage
  • Recombinant Proteins / adverse effects
  • Russia
  • Thrombolytic Therapy* / adverse effects
  • Thrombolytic Therapy* / methods
  • Time Factors
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator* / administration & dosage
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator* / adverse effects
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator* / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator
  • Fibrinolytic Agents
  • auR protein, Staphylococcus aureus
  • Recombinant Proteins
  • Metalloendopeptidases