Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Atorvastatin Versus Rosuvastatin : A Multi-database Cohort Study
- PMID: 39467290
- DOI: 10.7326/M24-0178
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Atorvastatin Versus Rosuvastatin : A Multi-database Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin are the most widely prescribed moderate- to high-intensity statins. However, evidence on their efficacy and safety during actual use is limited.
Objective: To compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin.
Design: Active comparator cohort study using target trial emulation.
Setting: The China Renal Data System (CRDS) and UK Biobank (UKB) databases.
Participants: Adults newly prescribed rosuvastatin or atorvastatin.
Measurements: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used after 1:1 multilevel propensity score matching.
Results: Among the 285 680 eligible participants in both databases, 6-year all-cause mortality was lower for rosuvastatin than for atorvastatin (2.57 vs. 2.83 per 100 person-years in the CRDS database and 0.66 vs. 0.90 per 100 person-years in the UKB database), with differences in cumulative incidence of -1.03% (95% CI, -1.44% to -0.46%) in the CRDS database and -1.38% (CI, -2.50% to -0.21%) in the UKB database. For secondary outcomes in both databases, rosuvastatin conferred lower risks for major adverse cardiovascular events and major adverse liver outcomes. In the UKB database, the risk for development of type 2 diabetes mellitus was higher with rosuvastatin, and the 2 medications carried similar risks for development of chronic kidney disease and other statin-related adverse effects.
Limitation: Possible residual confounding.
Conclusion: This study found differences in risks for some important outcomes associated with rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. The differences were relatively small, and many did not meet traditional standards for statistical significance. Further research is needed to understand whether these findings can be used with confidence in clinical practice.
Primary funding source: National Key R&D Program of China and National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Impact of pitavastatin on new-onset diabetes mellitus compared to atorvastatin and rosuvastatin: a distributed network analysis of 10 real-world databases.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 May 23;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01524-6. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022. PMID: 35606846 Free PMC article.
-
Real-World Analyses of the Safety Outcome among a General Population Treated with Statins: An Asian Population-Based Study.J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022 Aug 1;29(8):1213-1225. doi: 10.5551/jat.63076. Epub 2021 Sep 9. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2022. PMID: 34497171 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness of statins in secondary prevention among the older people aged 75 years and over.Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Apr;41(2):460-469. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00810-w. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019. PMID: 30864086
-
Lipid Screening in Childhood and Adolescence for Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Aug. Report No.: 14-05204-EF-2. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Aug. Report No.: 14-05204-EF-2. PMID: 27559556 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
A Comparative Study of High-intensity Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin Therapy Post-acute Coronary Syndrome Using Real-world Data.Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022 Jul;47(7):100956. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100956. Epub 2021 Aug 4. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 34363847 Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources