Hearing Screening in Older Adults in Primary Care Clinics: How the Effects of Setting and Provider Encouragement Differ by Patient Sex and Race

Ear Hear. 2025 Mar-Apr;46(2):512-522. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001604. Epub 2025 Feb 17.

Abstract

Objectives: Few studies have examined how patient sex or race influence hearing healthcare, which was our study purpose.

Design: We performed a secondary analysis using data from a pragmatic clinical trial that examined the effect of provider encouragement (yes/no) or setting (at-home/clinic) for older adults to follow through with routine hearing screening in primary care and the hearing healthcare pathway. Three protocols were compared: at-home screening without provider encouragement, at-home screening with provider encouragement, and in-clinic screening with provider encouragement.

Results: Poisson regression (n = 627) showed few differences by patient sex but showed that Black patients in the at-home protocols were less likely to schedule or complete a formal diagnostic evaluation after a failed screening compared with Black patients in the clinic setting and White patients in all groups. Black patients, regardless of provider encouragement, were less likely to schedule or complete a diagnostic evaluation compared with White patients.

Conclusions: Results suggest that in-clinic screenings may increase the use of hearing healthcare for Black patients.

Publication types

  • Pragmatic Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Black or African American* / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Hearing Loss* / diagnosis
  • Hearing Loss* / ethnology
  • Hearing Tests*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Screening*
  • Middle Aged
  • North Carolina
  • Primary Health Care*
  • Sex Factors
  • White* / statistics & numerical data