Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 2-year clinical and radiographic results from the open-label extension of the SELECT-AXIS 2 study

Arthritis Res Ther. 2024 Nov 12;26(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13075-024-03412-8.

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and inadequate response/intolerance to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) were evaluated through 1 year in the SELECT-AXIS 2 study. Here, we assess 2-year efficacy, safety, and imaging outcomes in SELECT-AXIS 2.

Methods: Patients who received continuous upadacitinib, and those who switched from placebo to upadacitinib at week 14, could enter the open-label extension (OLE). Efficacy endpoints included Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) and Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) responses, and changes from baseline in measures of disease activity, back pain, function, and quality of life. Radiographic progression was evaluated using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS). As observed (AO) and AO with non-responder imputation (AO-NRI) analyses were used for binary endpoints; AO with mixed-effects model for repeated measures (AO-MMRM) for continuous endpoints; and AO-analysis of covariance for mSASSS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in patients receiving ≥ 1 upadacitinib dose through week 104 are presented as events (E)/100 patient-years (PY). Subgroup analyses were performed by prior tumor necrosis factor/interleukin-17 inhibitor exposure and bDMARD lack of efficacy/intolerance.

Results: Of 420 patients who entered the bDMARD-IR AS study, 409 entered the OLE, and 331 (continuous upadacitinib, n = 163; placebo to upadacitinib, n = 168) completed week 104. Improvements in efficacy measures were sustained through the OLE, with similar response rates between the continuous upadacitinib and placebo to upadacitinib groups at week 104. At week 104, 64.9% and 61.7% of patients, respectively, had achieved ASAS 40% response (AO-NRI). Mean changes from baseline were similar between the two groups at week 104 across measures (ASDAS: -2.1 and -2.0; total back pain: -4.9 and -4.6, respectively; AO-MMRM). Over 93.0% of patients showed no radiographic progression (mSASSS mean change from baseline < 2) at week 104. The overall TEAE rate was 165.2 E/100 PY, with low rates of major adverse cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic events (0.3 E/100 PY each).

Conclusions: Upadacitinib efficacy, including very low rates of radiographic progression, was demonstrated through 104 weeks in treatment-refractory patients with active AS. Treatment was well tolerated, with no newly identified safety signals.

Trial registration: NCT04169373.

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; Biologic DMARD; Inadequate response; Open-label extension; Radiographic axial spondyloarthritis; Refractory; Upadacitinib.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Clinical Trial, Phase III

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antirheumatic Agents* / therapeutic use
  • Biological Products / adverse effects
  • Biological Products / therapeutic use
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring* / adverse effects
  • Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring* / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Spondylitis, Ankylosing* / diagnostic imaging
  • Spondylitis, Ankylosing* / drug therapy
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • upadacitinib
  • Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
  • Antirheumatic Agents
  • Biological Products

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04169373