Use of machine learning to identify prognostic variables for outcomes in chronic low back pain treatment: a retrospective analysis

J Man Manip Ther. 2025 Feb;33(1):63-72. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2424619. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

Abstract

Objectives: Most patients seen in physical therapy (PT) clinics for low back pain (LBP) are treated for chronic low back pain (CLBP), yet PT interventions suggest minimal effectiveness. The Cochrane Back Review Group proposed 'Holy Grail' questions, one being: 'What are the most important (preventable) predictors of chronicity' for patients with LBP? Subsequently, prognostic factors influencing outcomes for CLBP have been described, however results remain conflicting due to methodological weaknesses.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study examined prognostic risk factors for PT outcomes in CLBP treatment using a sub-type of AI. Bootstrap random forest supervised machine learning analysis was employed to identify the outcomes-associated variables.

Results: The top variables identified as predictive were: FOTO™ predicted functional status (FS) change score; FOTO™ predicted number of visits; initial FS score, age; history of jogging/walking, obesity, and previous treatments; provider education level; medication use; gender.

Conclusion: This article presents how AI can be used to predict risk prognostic factors in healthcare research. Improving predictive accuracy helps clinicians predict outcomes and determine most appropriate plans of care and may impact research attrition rates.

Keywords: Machine learning; artificial intelligence; chronic low back pain; physical therapy; prediction.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Chronic Pain* / therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Low Back Pain* / therapy
  • Machine Learning*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Physical Therapy Modalities*
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome