Pharmacological differences and switching among anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: A narrative review

Headache. 2025 Feb;65(2):342-352. doi: 10.1111/head.14903. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

Abstract

Antibodies targeting either the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), such as galcanezumab, fremanezumab, and eptinezumab, or the receptor (erenumab) have been approved for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine. Although widely used and generally effective, a proportion of patients discontinue treatment due to lack of efficacy. In both randomized controlled trials and observational studies, all anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have consistently demonstrated comparable efficacy and tolerability, suggesting a pharmacological class effect. However, differences in therapeutic targets, structure, and pharmacokinetic characteristics may influence their efficacy and safety differently. Therefore, in patients not achieving a clinically meaningful response with one anti-CGRP antibody, switching to a different antibody may be a viable option. This review examines the pharmacological characteristics and distinctions among anti-CGRP mAbs, highlighting their mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles, along with the clinical observational data of switching. Finally, we summarize suggestions from international guidelines.

Keywords: calcitonin gene–related peptide; monoclonal antibodies; switch.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal* / pharmacology
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal* / therapeutic use
  • Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists* / pharmacology
  • Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide* / immunology
  • Drug Substitution*
  • Humans
  • Migraine Disorders* / drug therapy

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide
  • Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists