Background: The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is widely used for detecting postoperative functional disability. Its responsiveness for detecting disability has been evaluated at 1 year after surgery, with no long-term evaluation. The aim of this study was to examine the responsiveness of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule in detecting functional disability at 5 years after surgery.
Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. Patients were enrolled who were aged 55 years or older and underwent elective non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia. They were asked to complete the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form questionnaires before surgery and at 5 years after surgery. The correlation between changes in WHO Disability Assessment Schedule score and Medical Outcome Study Short Form physical score (change in physical component score) was evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ). The standardized response means were also calculated for typical subgroups for which functional disability was predicted to improve or decline and compared with the overall standardized response mean.
Results: In the analysis, 2596 patients were included. A moderate correlation (ρ = -0.47) existed between changes in WHO Disability Assessment Schedule and physical Medical Outcome Study Short Form scores. The overall standardized response mean was 0.17. The standardized response means for the patients with functional disability predicted to improve ranged from -0.45 to -0.67, whereas those for patients predicted to decline ranged from 0.17 to 0.56. These findings indicated high responsiveness.
Conclusion: The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 has a high responsiveness at 5 years after surgery. It can be used to detect functional disability at 5 years after surgery.
The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 is often used to measure disabilities in patients after surgery. It is commonly used to assess disability within the first year after surgery; however, its effectiveness in detecting long-term disabilities over several years has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to determine how well WHODAS can identify disabilities in patients 5 years after surgery. Researchers studied 2596 patients who had non-cardiac surgery. They completed the 12-item WHODAS and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form (SF-8) questionnaires before surgery and again 5 years later. The study compared changes in WHODAS scores with changes in SF-8 physical health scores. WHODAS was effective in detecting long-term disabilities, showing a good link between changes in WHODAS scores and physical health. This finding indicated that WHODAS 2.0 is a useful tool for identifying disabilities, even 5 years after surgery, thereby helping catalogue long-term patient care.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.