Efficacy and Prognostic Indicators of Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IsaPd) in Daratumumab-Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Multicenter Real-World Study
- PMID: 39898517
- DOI: 10.1002/hon.70042
Efficacy and Prognostic Indicators of Isatuximab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IsaPd) in Daratumumab-Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Multicenter Real-World Study
Abstract
This multicenter real-world analysis evaluated the efficacy of isatuximab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (IsaPd) in 51 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who were refractory to daratumumab (Dara-R). The majority were under 70 years old (60.8%), predominantly female (56.9%), and heavily pretreated, with 74.5% being triple-class refractory (TCR); 32.1% of the 28 patients with cytogenetic data had high-risk abnormalities. The overall response rate (ORR) was 56.9%, including 3 patients with stringent complete response (sCR), 4 with CR, and 7 with very good partial response (VGPR). Neither age, number of prior therapies, TCR status, nor time from Dara refractoriness to IsaPd initiation significantly affected response rates. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months, with a 12-month PFS probability of 30.6%. Baseline hemoglobin (Hb) levels were a key predictor of PFS: patients with Hb < 11.8 g/L had a 3.5-fold increased risk of progression, with a median PFS of 4.6 months compared to 22 months in those with higher Hb. Median overall survival (OS) was 21.0 months, with a 12-month OS probability of 63.4%. Lower Hb levels (< 11 g/L) were associated with a tenfold increased risk of mortality. Among the 28 patients who underwent FISH analysis, while no significant difference in mortality risk was observed, those with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities exhibited a nearly tenfold increased risk of disease progression. These results suggest that IsaPd offers a meaningful option for Dara-R patients, with Hb levels serving as a critical predictor of both PFS and OS. However, PFS remains modest, underscoring the need for novel combination therapies.
Keywords: dara‐refractory; dexamethasone; isatuximab; multiple myeloma; pomalidomide; salvage therapy.
© 2025 The Author(s). Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
-
- A. J. Cowan, D. J. Green, M. Kwok, et al., “Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Myeloma: A Review,” JAMA 327, no. 5 (2022): 464–477, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.0003.
-
- F. Malard, P. Neri, N. J. Bahlis, et al., “Multiple Myeloma,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers 10, no. 1 (2024): 45, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572‐024‐00529‐7.
-
- U. H. Gandhi, R. F. Cornell, A. Lakshman, et al., “Outcomes of Patients With Multiple Myeloma Refractory to CD38‐Targeted Monoclonal Antibody Therapy,” Leukemia 33, no. 9 (2019): 2266–2275, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375‐019‐0435‐7.
-
- P. Tacchetti, M. Talarico, S. Barbato, et al., “Antibody‐Drug Conjugates, Bispecific Antibodies and CAR‐T Cells Therapy in Multiple Myeloma,” Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 24, no. 6 (2024): 379–395, https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2344647.
-
- G. J. Schiller, B. C. Lipe, N. J. Bahlis, et al., “Selinexor‐Based Triplet Regimens in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Anti‐CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies,” Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia 23, no. 9 (2023): e286–e296.e4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2023.06.001.