Clinical validity of automated refraction with the Chronos binocular refraction system compared to standard refraction techniques

J Fr Ophtalmol. 2025 Apr;48(4):104477. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2025.104477. Epub 2025 Mar 13.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of automated refraction by the Chronos device (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with standard refraction techniques.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study recruited patients who underwent refraction with the Nidek ARK-1 autorefraction [Nidek Technologies, Gamagori, Japan] and manual subjective refraction (standard method group), followed by autorefraction and guided subjective refraction with the Chronos binocular refraction system [Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan] (Chronos method group). Concordance rates were set based on mean absolute differences of refractive measurements. Bland-Altman analysis, non-parametric analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) were used to assess agreement between methods.

Results: In all, 361 eyes of 182 patients (mean age 37.4±17.5 years) were included. Slightly more myopic mean objective and subjective sphere (P=0.005; P<0.001), cylinder (P=0.001; P<0.001) and spherical equivalent (SE; P<0.001 for both) values were observed with the Chronos method. No statistically significant differences were seen for objective and subjective J0 (P=0.947; P=0.312) and objective and subjective J45 (P=0.131; P=0.084) values. High concordance between methods (difference ≤0.25 D) was greater for objective sphere (79.0%), cylinder (87.1%), and SE (71.7%), than for subjective measurements (65.7%, 80.8%, and 57.0%, respectively). The methods were strongly correlated for objective and subjective sphere (r=0.983, P<0.001; r=0.971, P<0.001, respectively) and for objective and subjective cylinder (r=0.936, P<0.001; r=0.869, P<0.001, respectively). Good agreement was observed between the two methods with low systematic bias and clinically acceptable mean differences.

Conclusion: The results showed good agreement and strong correlations between both methods, suggesting that the Chronos device can be a good alternative technique for refractive error screening in routine clinical practice.

Keywords: Auto-réfracteur; Autorefractor; Chronos binocular refraction system; Erreur de réfraction; Nidek ARK-1; Refractive error; Réfraction subjective; Subjective refraction; Système de réfraction binoculaire Chronos.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Refraction, Ocular* / physiology
  • Refractive Errors* / diagnosis
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Vision Tests* / instrumentation
  • Vision Tests* / methods
  • Vision, Binocular / physiology
  • Young Adult