Background: In primary cutaneous melanoma (CM) with metastatic sentinel lymph node(s) (SLNB), treatment strategies may include completing a regional lymph node dissection (CLND). The prognostic benefit of this therapeutic approach remains a topic of debate. This retrospective, population-based cohort study explores the prognostic impact of CLND in a real-world clinical setting.
Methods: This study analysed 280 incident cases of AJCC stage III CM with metastatic SLNB, as recorded by the Veneto population-based Regional Cancer Registry in 2015, 2017, and 2019. The overall survival and CM-specific survival rates were compared between patients who underwent CLND and those who did not. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and Fine-Gray models for competing risks tested the relationship between lymphadenectomy and overall and CM-specific survival.
Results: Among CM patients with metastatic SLNB, 199/280 (71.1%) proceeded with CLND. When compared to those who did not receive treatment, CLND did not demonstrate significant advantages in terms of overall survival and CM-specific survival rates. The cost analysis found no significant differences in treatment choice (estimated costs: €23,695.71 for the treated group and €25,003.55 for the untreated group [p = 0.69]).
Conclusions: The present real-world data support omitting CLND in stage III CM with histologically documented sentinel nodal metastasis.
Keywords: Cohort study; Cutaneous melanoma; Direct costs; Lymphadenectomy; Melanoma surgery; Real-world data; Survival.
© 2025. The Author(s).