Effects of the Informed Health Choices secondary school intervention on the ability of lower secondary students in Kenya to think critically about health choices: 1-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized trial

Trials. 2025 Apr 7;26(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08810-0.

Abstract

Introduction: The Informed Health Choices (IHC) secondary school intervention aimed to teach students to assess claims about treatments. This follow-up of a cluster randomized trial assessed the retention of knowledge and the application of the nine prioritized IHC key concepts 1 year after the intervention.

Methods: We conducted a random assignment of 80 secondary schools in Western Kenya into either the intervention (n = 40) or control (n = 40) group. Both groups adhered to the standard curriculum. Teachers from the intervention group were invited to participate in a 2-day training workshop and were granted access to "Be Smart About Your Health" digital resources, comprising 10 lessons. These lessons, focused on nine prioritized IHC concepts, delivered over a single school term from May to August 2022. The digital resources were accessible online via smartphones or computers and could also be downloaded for offline use. The primary outcome measure, assessed at the end of the school term and again after 1 year, was the percentage of students achieving a passing score (defined as ≥ 9 out of 18 correct answers) on the "Critical Thinking about Health" test.

Results: Out of the total 3360 students involved in the trial, 2446 (72.8%) completed the test after 1 year. Within the intervention group, 728 out of 1369 students (53.2%) achieved a passing score after 1 year, compared to 61.7% immediately post-intervention. In contrast, in the control group, 347 out of 1077 students (32.2%) had a passing score after 1 year. The adjusted difference in passing rates between the intervention and control groups after 1 year was 20.8% (with a 95% confidence interval of 13.6 to 28.0%), compared to 27.3% (with a 95% confidence interval of 19.6 to 34.9%) immediately after the intervention.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that students were able to retain knowledge and the ability to apply the IHC key concepts, 1 year after the intervention. But fewer students in the intervention group had a passing score after 1 year compared to just after the intervention. Highlighting follow-up training is likely necessary to reinforce these skills over time.

Trial registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, trial identifier: PACTR202204883917313. Registered on 05/04/2022.

Keywords: Critical health literacy; Critical thinking; Health information; Kenya; Secondary school curriculum; Treatment claims.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adolescent Behavior*
  • Choice Behavior*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Health Education* / methods
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Kenya
  • Male
  • School Health Services*
  • Schools
  • Students* / psychology
  • Thinking*
  • Time Factors