Expert Perspective: How, When, and Why to Potentially Stop Antiresorptive Drugs in Osteoporosis

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025 Oct;77(10):1294-1304. doi: 10.1002/art.43179. Epub 2025 May 19.

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease, and antiresorptive treatments are often continued for many years. Despite their established efficacy in reducing fracture risk, the most commonly used antiresorptive treatments, bisphosphonates and denosumab, have short- and long-term risks that, coupled with their benefits and other unique characteristics, influence consideration for at least periodic discontinuation. Bisphosphonates retain their effects even after discontinuation due to their prolonged skeletal retention, whereas denosumab discontinuation is associated with a rapid rebound in bone turnover and increased fracture risk. There is controversy about how, when, and why to potentially stop these agents. We discuss both permanent and temporary discontinuation of long-term treatment with bisphosphonates and denosumab. We focus on the reasons and timing for discontinuation as well as strategies to mitigate future fracture risk.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bone Density Conservation Agents* / administration & dosage
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents* / therapeutic use
  • Denosumab* / administration & dosage
  • Denosumab* / therapeutic use
  • Diphosphonates* / administration & dosage
  • Diphosphonates* / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Osteoporosis* / drug therapy
  • Osteoporotic Fractures* / prevention & control
  • Withholding Treatment*

Substances

  • Bone Density Conservation Agents
  • Denosumab
  • Diphosphonates