Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, (198), 43-9

Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries

  • PMID: 4028566
Comparative Study

Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries

Y Tegner et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res.

Abstract

Many different methods of evaluating disability after knee ligament injury exist. Most of them differ in design. Some are based on only patients' symptoms. Other include patients' symptoms, activity grading, performance in a test, and clinical findings. The rating in these evaluating systems can be either numerical, as in a score, or binary, with yes/no answers. Comparison between a symptom-related score and a score of more complex design showed that the symptom-related score gave a more differentiated picture of the disability. It was also shown that the binary rating system gave less detailed information than a score and that differences in a binary rating can depend on at what level the symptoms are regarded as "significant." A new activity grading scale, where work and sport activities were graded numerically, was constructed as complement to the functional score. When evaluating knee ligament injuries, stability testing, functional knee score, performance test, and activity grading are all important. However, the relative importance varies during the course of treatment, and therefore they should not all be included in one and the same score.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 875 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback