Objective: In the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low (HER2-L) is defined as an HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative fluorescence in situ hybridization. Limited data report poor agreement in scoring HER2-0 vs 1+. We aim to investigate the HER2 IHC concordance rate, with focus on HER2-0 vs HER2-L groups. We evaluate the impact of a single training session on concordance.
Methods: Nine breast pathologists from the same institution reviewed 60 HER2 IHC stains on breast biopsy specimens in 2 rounds of 30 cases each. An educational slide review session was provided between the 2 rounds. Interobserver Cohen κ values were computed and compared.
Results: Overall complete agreement for HER2 IHC was noted in 37 (62%) of 60 cases, with similar agreement in the first round (19/30 [63%]) and second round (18/30 [60%]). For all 60 cases, κ values ranged from .517 to .895, with 92% of κ values in substantial agreement or better range. For combined HER2-0 and HER2-L cases, κ values ranged from .298 to .826, with only 45% of κ values in substantial agreement or better range. In HER2-L only cases, 50% of the scorer pairs of κ values were 0 or less (no agreement), and only 14% of pairs showed substantial or better agreement. The educational session did not improve the κ values. Faint and heterogeneous HER2 expression, cytoplasmic blush, dislodged cells, and in situ component led to poor concordance in HER2-0 vs HER2-L.
Conclusions: Poor concordance on HER2-0 vs HER2-L and lack of improvement after a training session likely suggest ineffective HER2 IHC expression range in HER2 low spectrum.
Keywords: Cohen κ; HER2 quantitative assay; breast cancer; continuous education; cytoplasmic blush; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.