Encorafenib, Cetuximab, and mFOLFOX6 in BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer

N Engl J Med. 2025 Jun 26;392(24):2425-2437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2501912. Epub 2025 May 30.

Abstract

Background: First-line treatment with encorafenib plus cetuximab (EC) with or without chemotherapy (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil [mFOLFOX6]) for BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, an aggressive subtype with a poor prognosis, was compared with standard care (chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab) in an open-label, phase 3 trial, which showed significance regarding one of the two primary end points, objective response according to blinded independent central review (odds ratio for EC+mFOLFOX6 vs. standard care, 2.44; one-sided P<0.001). This result led to accelerated Food and Drug Administration approval of this investigational combination therapy for BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, including as first-line therapy. Data on progression-free survival (the second primary end point) and an updated interim analysis of overall survival are now available.

Methods: We randomly assigned patients with untreated BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer to receive EC, EC+mFOLFOX6, or standard care. The two primary end points were objective response (reported previously) and progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review in the EC+mFOLFOX6 group and the standard-care group. The key secondary end point was overall survival.

Results: Significantly longer progression-free survival was seen with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care (median, 12.8 vs. 7.1 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.68; P<0.001). In an interim analysis, overall survival was significantly longer with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care (median, 30.3 vs. 15.1 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.63; P<0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events during treatment was 46.1% with EC+mFOLFOX6 and 38.9% with standard care. Safety profiles were consistent with those known for each agent.

Conclusions: This trial showed significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival with first-line treatment with EC+mFOLFOX6 than with standard care among patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. (Funded by Pfizer and others; BREAKWATER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04607421.).

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols* / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols* / adverse effects
  • Carbamates* / administration & dosage
  • Carbamates* / adverse effects
  • Cetuximab* / administration & dosage
  • Cetuximab* / adverse effects
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / genetics
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / mortality
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Female
  • Fluorouracil
  • Humans
  • Leucovorin
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mutation
  • Neoplasm Metastasis / drug therapy
  • Organoplatinum Compounds
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf* / genetics
  • Sulfonamides* / administration & dosage
  • Sulfonamides* / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • BRAF protein, human
  • Carbamates
  • Cetuximab
  • encorafenib
  • Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
  • Sulfonamides
  • Leucovorin
  • Fluorouracil
  • Organoplatinum Compounds

Supplementary concepts

  • Folfox protocol

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04607421