Imprecision medicine: Systematic gaps in reporting variants of uncertain significance (VUS) and their reclassifications

Abstract

Purpose: Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are frequently encountered during clinical genetic testing. To explore the clinical burden of VUS, we developed the Brotman Baty Institute Clinical Variant Database, which is an electronic health record (EHR)-linked database of clinical germline genetic variant information from patients with rare genetic disorders seen at 2 tertiary academic medical centers.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed EHRs and genetic testing reports from 5158 patients seen across diverse adult genetics practices at these institutions from 2015 to 2024. We also compared these EHR-based variant classifications with those in ClinVar.

Results: The number of reported VUS relative to pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants can vary by over 14-fold depending on the primary indication for genetic testing and 3-fold depending on self-reported race. Furthermore, at least 1.6% of variant classifications used in the EHR for clinical care are outdated based on ClinVar variant classifications, including 26 instances in which the testing lab updated ClinVar, but the reclassification was never communicated to the patient.

Conclusion: Our findings reveal that the clinical burden of VUS in adult medical genetics is unequally distributed across patients. We also highlight a deficiency in existing systems for communicating variant reclassifications to ClinVar, patients, and providers.

Keywords: Variant classification; Variant reclassification; Variants of uncertain significance (VUS).