Comparative Evaluation of 3 Neonatal Simulators for Neonatal Resuscitation and Airway Obstruction Skills in Medical Students

Sage Open Pediatr. 2025 Sep 16:12:30502225251369426. doi: 10.1177/30502225251369426. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of 3 neonatal simulators in training medical students in resuscitation skills.

Introduction: Simulation-based training is a critical component of neonatal resuscitation education. However, few studies have compared the educational value of different neonatal simulators.

Methods: Sixty-eight fourth-year medical students participated in a Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation session using the Brayden Baby, Prestan Professional, and Baby Anne simulators. Following hands-on practice, students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating each simulator. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests.

Results: Brayden Baby was significantly preferred in 7 out of 9 categories, including ease of positioning, ventilation, mask placement, and overall realism (P < .05). Baby Anne was rated highest for realism in foreign body removal.

Conclusion: Brayden Baby emerged as the most effective simulator, indicating its greater suitability for neonatal training. Careful simulator selection may enhance learning outcomes in neonatal resuscitation education.

Keywords: airway management; medical education; neonatal resuscitation; neonatal simulators; simulation-based training.