Comparison of Short-Term Surgical Outcomes for Thymectomy With Various Minimally Invasive Approaches: A Single-Centre Experience

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Nov 2;67(11):ezaf366. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf366.

Abstract

Objectives: Minimally invasive thymectomy, encompassing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery, is increasingly being adopted as an alternative to sternotomy. However, comparative data on commonly used minimally invasive techniques remain limited. This study aimed to compare the short-term surgical outcomes of 3 approaches: lateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, lateral robotic-assisted thoracic surgery and subxiphoid robotic-assisted thoracic surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 292 patients who underwent minimally invasive thymectomy for anterior mediastinal masses between October 2020 and April 2024. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the surgical approach. Perioperative outcomes, including operating time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and complications, were compared.

Results: Of the 292 patients, 155 underwent lateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; 70 underwent lateral robotic-assisted thoracic surgery; and 67 underwent subxiphoid robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. Operative time was significantly longer in both robotic-assisted thoracic surgery groups compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (lateral robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: 118.7 min; subxiphoid robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: 116.7 min; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: 93.5 min; P < .001). No significant differences were observed among the 3 groups in terms of postoperative pain, chest tube duration, hospital stay, complication rate, or R0 resection. No in-hospital deaths occurred.

Conclusions: All 3 minimally invasive approaches for thymectomy demonstrated comparable short-term outcomes, although robotic-assisted thoracic surgery procedures had longer operating times. These findings suggest that lateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, lateral robotic-assisted thoracic surgery, and subxiphoid robotic-assisted thoracic surgery are all safe and effective options, enabling surgeons to select the most appropriate technique based on individual patient characteristics and their surgical expertise.

Keywords: minimally invasive approach; robotic-assisted thoracic surgery; thymectomy; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures* / methods
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / methods
  • Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted* / adverse effects
  • Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted* / methods
  • Thymectomy* / adverse effects
  • Thymectomy* / methods
  • Thymus Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome