Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven image reconstruction has shown potential for enhancing image quality in CT angiography while reducing radiation exposure. However, reproducibility and methodological transparency are essential for real-world adoption.
Purpose: To compare image quality and radiation dose of cerebral CT angiography reconstructed with conventional iterative reconstruction (IR) and AI-based Precise Imaging (PI) at 100 kVp using a reduced Dose Right Index (DRI-15).
Methods: In this prospective single-center study, 68 patients underwent 100 kVp cerebral CT angiography with a 50% reduced Dose Right Index (DRI-15 vs. DRI-36). Identical raw datasets were reconstructed using IR (iDose4) and PI. Quantitative analysis included attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), while two blinded radiologists independently performed qualitative assessment using a 5-point Likert scale. Radiation dose metrics (CTDIvol, DLP, effective dose) were recorded. Standardized acquisition protocols, fixed contrast injection, and consistent ROI placement ensured reproducibility.
Results: PI reconstructions yielded significantly lower noise and higher SNR and CNR than IR (all p < 0.001; r = 0.61-0.71), with no difference in vascular attenuation (p = 0.118). Qualitative scores were superior for PI across all criteria (p < 0.01), while inter-rater agreement was substantial for both methods, slightly higher with IR. The median effective dose was 0.785 mSv (IQR 0.71-0.90).
Conclusion: AI-based PI reconstruction enhances image quality without increasing radiation dose or altering vascular attenuation, consistently outperforming IR and supporting its use in low-dose cerebral CT angiography, especially in dose-sensitive patients.
Keywords: AI-based reconstruction; CT Cerebral angiography; Head CT angiography; Iterative reconstruction; Low dose right index; Low tube voltage.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.