Outcomes of Witnessed Versus Unwitnessed Patients With Stroke After Endovascular Therapy in the Extended Time Window

Stroke. 2026 Feb;57(2):362-370. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052355. Epub 2025 Nov 12.

Abstract

Background: It remains unclear whether outcomes of patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy with large-vessel occlusion and unwitnessed onset of stroke differ from those with witnessed onset in the extended time window.

Methods: We enrolled patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion (internal carotid artery, M1, or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery) undergoing endovascular thrombectomy within 6 to 24 hours from the time last seen well, from 2014 to 2022, at 66 sites in Europe, North America, and Asia. Patients with a prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of >3 or age <18 were excluded. We categorized patients by onset mode as witnessed or unwitnessed. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale shift at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were functional independence, a composite of functional independence or return of Rankin to prestroke level, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and a composite of severe disability or mortality at 90 days. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to compare outcomes between the groups.

Results: Of 5098 patients assessed for eligibility, we included 2073, of whom 1760 (84.9%) had unwitnessed onset, and 313 (15.1%) were witnessed. In the univariate comparison (before inverse probability of treatment weighting), 38.8% of the unwitnessed and 45.7% of the witnessed patients achieved functional independence (P=0.022). Mortality was 21.6% among unwitnessed and 22.0% among witnessed (P=0.847), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were 6.6% and 5.8%, respectively (P=0.623). The primary outcome (modified Rankin Scale shift) showed no difference comparing unwitnessed to witnessed patients (odds ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.82-2.20]; P=0.235) in the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Unwitnessed patients were more likely to achieve functional independence or return of Rankin (1.53 [1.01-2.33]; P=0.045). Other secondary outcomes did not differ between the witnessed and unwitnessed patients.

Conclusions: In the extended time window, unwitnessed patients with large-vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy have at least the same likelihood of favorable outcomes as witnessed patients.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04096248.

Keywords: intracranial hemorrhage; ischemic stroke; middle cerebral artery; thrombectomy; tomography.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Endovascular Procedures* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Ischemic Stroke* / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Stroke* / surgery
  • Thrombectomy* / methods
  • Time Factors
  • Time-to-Treatment*
  • Treatment Outcome

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04096248