Neuroanatomical dimensions in major depression linked to cognition, adverse life events, self-harm, metabolomics and genetics

Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Nov 15;5(1):502. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01219-5.

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet its diagnosis relies on clinical symptoms alone.

Methods: Using the semi-supervised machine learning algorithm, Heterogeneity through Discriminative Analysis (HYDRA), we had identified two neuroanatomical dimensions in deeply phenotyped (i.e., comprehensively assessed across neuroimaging, clinical, and behavioural domains), medication-free participants with MDD from the COORDINATE-MDD consortium. In the present study, we apply this pre-trained HYDRA model to the UK Biobank (UKB) to validate these dimensions in a large general population and a subsample with current depressive symptoms.

Results: Dimension 2 (D2), compared to Dimension 1 (D1), is characterized by reduced grey and white matter volumes and limited treatment response to antidepressant and placebo medications. Out-of-sample validation in the UKB general population (n = 37,235) confirms these neuroanatomical features and reveals D2 associations with cognitive impairments, adverse life events, self-harm and suicide attempts, a pro-atherogenic lipid profile, and genetic links to neurodegenerative traits. Similar profiles are observed in the UKB subsample with current depressive symptoms (n = 1455).

Conclusions: D1 and D2 represent distinct neurobiological mechanisms underlying MDD. The validation in a general population-based cohort and in a cohort sample with depressive symptoms delineates mechanisms underlying heterogeneity in MDD.

Plain language summary

Major depressive disorder is a common and disabling condition, but people differ greatly in their symptoms and responses to treatment. We used brain scans and machine learning to identify two patterns of brain structure linked to depression. One pattern showed relatively preserved brain volume and was associated with better treatment response. The other showed widespread reductions in brain volume and was related to poorer memory and thinking skills, greater exposure to adverse life events, increased risk of self-harm, and metabolic and genetic changes. These findings were confirmed in a large general population sample as well as in people with current depressive symptoms. The results suggest that depression includes distinct brain-based subtypes, which may help explain differences in treatment response and guide the development of more personalised approaches.