Sex and gender influence on adverse events for melanoma patients: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis

Br J Cancer. 2026 Feb;134(3):359-366. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03266-0. Epub 2025 Nov 22.

Abstract

Immunotherapy (IMMUNO) and targeted therapy (TT) have revolutionised melanoma treatment. However, adverse events (AEs) remain frequent and may affect treatment adherence. Female sex has been linked to a higher risk of AEs in cytotoxic therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the effect of Sex and Gender (S/G) on AEs during IMMUNO and/or TT in melanoma. Independent studies published up to April 2024 reporting toxicity by S/G in melanoma patients were included. Summary Odds Ratios (sOR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Sixty-nine studies were included. Women had a significantly higher risk of thyroid-related AEs compared to men (sOR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.41-2.82, I2 = 32%). No significant S/G differences were found for Grade III-IV, dermatological, gastrointestinal, hypophysis, kidney, liver, or ocular toxicities. This meta-analysis highlights a S/G based difference in the occurrence of thyroid-related AEs, particularly during first-line treatment. The observed association of dermatological AEs with TT in women, while intriguing, is based on limited evidence and should be considered hypothesis-generating. Overall, these findings suggest the need for closer monitoring of women for thyroid-related, dermatological, and severe AEs, with future studies warranted to confirm these signals in larger, adequately powered cohorts.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy* / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Melanoma* / drug therapy
  • Melanoma* / therapy
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy / adverse effects
  • Sex Factors