Risk Assessment Code (RAC), which treats the percentage of the Bureau Communautaire de Référence (BCR) acid-extractable fraction (PF1) as a proxy for heavy metal (HMs) mobility, is widely used to evaluate soil HMs mobility risk. Yet it may lead to pH-dependent bias if PF1 increases or remains constant with rising pH. However, the PF1-pH relationship remains unclear. This study synthesizes 5151 observations from 162 studies and use nonparametric statistics, random forests, and SHapley Additive exPlanations to quantify PF1-pH relationships for eight HMs, and assess modulation by environmental properties. Results show PF1 increases with pH for Cr, Fe, Mn, and Pb (p<0.05); peaks near neutral pH (6.5-7.0) for Zn; shows a V-shaped trend with an inflection around neutral pH ≈ 7.0 for Cu; exhibits weak dependence for Cd and Ni. Mean annual temperature, mean annual precipitation, clay, and organic carbon modulate PF1-pH patterns for Cu, Cd, Fe, Pb and Ni, respectively. These findings indicate RAC systematically overestimates risk under alkaline conditions, as HMs mobility declines with pH whereas PF1 for Cr, Fe, Mn, and Pb rises. Based on these findings, we propose a conceptual fraction-environment coupling framework integrating subfraction weighting and environmental-factor correction to recalibrate RAC for more accurate soil quality assessment.
Keywords: BCR acid-extractable fraction; Mobility risk assessment; Soil heavy metals; Soil pH.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier B.V.